Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1951 Hawaii cyclone"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nova Crystallis
(new DYK nom)
imported>Yoninah
(cites needed, hook)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. I'm wondering, though, where you got all that information in the first paragraph under Meteorological history &ndash; are you interpreting the statistical charts in footnotes 2 and 3? Per DYK rules, you need to add a cite after the sentences describing the second and third landfalls. Also, I suggest adding "in 1951" to the hook to place it in context. No QPQ needed for under-5 DYKs nominator. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:31, 29 June 2014

1951 Hawaii cyclone

  • Comment: Going to review another DYK, even though I don't have to QPQ. (Start training :P)

Moved to mainspace by CycloneIsaac (talk). Self nominated at 21:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. I'm wondering, though, where you got all that information in the first paragraph under Meteorological history – are you interpreting the statistical charts in footnotes 2 and 3? Per DYK rules, you need to add a cite after the sentences describing the second and third landfalls. Also, I suggest adding "in 1951" to the hook to place it in context. No QPQ needed for under-5 DYKs nominator. Yoninah (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2014 (UTC)