Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1961 Major League Baseball expansion"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giants2008
(QPQ review done)
imported>Bloom6132
(GTG)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New article is 7,740 characters long and was completed on the same day as nomination.  Duplication detector check of online sources [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F1961_Major_League_Baseball_expansion&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsabr.org%2Fresearch%2Fmis-management-101-american-league-expansion-1961&minwords=2&minchars=13&removequotations=1][https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F1961_Major_League_Baseball_expansion&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fusatoday30.usatoday.com%2Fsports%2Fbaseball%2F2011-04-07-angels-baseball-expansion_N.htm&minwords=2&minchars=13][https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F1961_Major_League_Baseball_expansion&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseball-reference.com%2Fdraft%2F1960-expansion-draft.shtml&minwords=2&minchars=13] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF all other sources that are offline and waiving direct quotes).  Article is well-sourced.  Hook is 128 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting.  Ref 3 (verifying the hook) is a reliable online source from ''[[USA Today]]''.  Only a QPQ is left to be done before I'll give a tick. —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 06:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New article is 7,740 characters long and was completed on the same day as nomination.  Duplication detector check of online sources [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F1961_Major_League_Baseball_expansion&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsabr.org%2Fresearch%2Fmis-management-101-american-league-expansion-1961&minwords=2&minchars=13&removequotations=1][https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F1961_Major_League_Baseball_expansion&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fusatoday30.usatoday.com%2Fsports%2Fbaseball%2F2011-04-07-angels-baseball-expansion_N.htm&minwords=2&minchars=13][https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F1961_Major_League_Baseball_expansion&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baseball-reference.com%2Fdraft%2F1960-expansion-draft.shtml&minwords=2&minchars=13] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF all other sources that are offline and waiving direct quotes).  Article is well-sourced.  Hook is 128 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting.  Ref 3 (verifying the hook) is a reliable online source from ''[[USA Today]]''.  Only a QPQ is left to be done before I'll give a tick. —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 06:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 
::*The review is done and posted above. Sorry it wasn't done before, but the review here came a little faster than I expected. [[User:Giants2008|<font color="blue">Giants2008</font>]] ([[User talk:Giants2008|<font color="darkblue">Talk</font>]]) 02:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 
::*The review is done and posted above. Sorry it wasn't done before, but the review here came a little faster than I expected. [[User:Giants2008|<font color="blue">Giants2008</font>]] ([[User talk:Giants2008|<font color="darkblue">Talk</font>]]) 02:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 +
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ done.  Looks good to go! —[[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]] ([[User talk:Bloom6132|talk]]) 09:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:39, 28 October 2014

1961 Major League Baseball expansion

Wrigley Field

Created by Giants2008 (talk). Self nominated at 20:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New article is 7,740 characters long and was completed on the same day as nomination. Duplication detector check of online sources [1][2][3] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF all other sources that are offline and waiving direct quotes). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 128 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 3 (verifying the hook) is a reliable online source from USA Today. Only a QPQ is left to be done before I'll give a tick. —Bloom6132 (talk) 06:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The review is done and posted above. Sorry it wasn't done before, but the review here came a little faster than I expected. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)