Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1965 Norwegian Second Division"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome for *mp; no change in content) |
imported>IznoBot m (→top: Lint DYKN archive pattern (Task 2 trial), replaced: <b>talk page guidelines</b> for (<b>more</b>) information.</i></span>{{clear}} → <b>talk page guidelines</b> fo) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | ||
− | :{{DYKF|11}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[1965 Norwegian Second Division]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/1965 Norwegian Second Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:1965 Norwegian Second Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</ | + | :{{DYKF|11}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[1965 Norwegian Second Division]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/1965 Norwegian Second Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:1965 Norwegian Second Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}} |
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 00:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC).<br /> | The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 00:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC).<br /> |
Latest revision as of 03:05, 19 October 2018
The following is an archived discussion of 1965 Norwegian Second Division's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 00:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC).
DYK toolbox |
---|
1965 Norwegian Second Division
- ... that when Kvik lost 8–2 against Hødd in the decisive match of the 1965 Norwegian Second Division, their rivals Rosenborg lost the promotion on goal difference?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Frank Esposito (politician)
- Comment: I'm open to suggestion for rewording the hook
Moved to mainspace by Mentoz86 (talk). Self nominated at 00:57, 7 March 2013 (UTC).
: The length, amount of sourcing, and overall quality of the article look good to me, with the one caveat that I cannot read Norwegian and thus cannot verify the references (including the hook, which I am accepting in good faith). It would probably be a good idea for a reviewer who understands Norwegian to take a look at this nomination. Michael Barera (talk) 05:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC)