Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1987 World Snooker Championship"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Usedtobecool
(review)
imported>Mandarax
m (Restore "}}" to correct location)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] The article has been expanded 5x (10-14x between 24 and 27 May), has not been featured on the mainpage before, is long enough (16 KB prose), has inline citations to sources that look generally reliable, hook is present and cited inline to a reliable source, no bare urls, copyvio or blpvio concerns, neutral and undisputed. QPQ checks out. The hook made perfect sense after I read the article and realised "qualifying" was a noun in this context, that's probably a good thing for DYK even if it isn't just me. So, it gets the tick from me with AGF on the sourcing used for the hook, which has no bluelinks. '''[[User:Usedtobecool|Usedtobecool]] [[User talk:Usedtobecool|☎️]]''' 14:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] The article has been expanded 5x (10-14x between 24 and 27 May), has not been featured on the mainpage before, is long enough (16 KB prose), has inline citations to sources that look generally reliable, hook is present and cited inline to a reliable source, no bare urls, copyvio or blpvio concerns, neutral and undisputed. QPQ checks out. The hook made perfect sense after I read the article and realised "qualifying" was a noun in this context, that's probably a good thing for DYK even if it isn't just me. So, it gets the tick from me with AGF on the sourcing used for the hook, which has no bluelinks. '''[[User:Usedtobecool|Usedtobecool]] [[User talk:Usedtobecool|☎️]]''' 14:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  
{{Reflist-talk}}}}
+
{{Reflist-talk}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 22:07, 30 May 2020

1987 World Snooker Championship

5x expanded by Lee Vilenski (talk) and BennyOnTheLoose (talk). Nominated by Lee Vilenski (talk) at 18:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg The article has been expanded 5x (10-14x between 24 and 27 May), has not been featured on the mainpage before, is long enough (16 KB prose), has inline citations to sources that look generally reliable, hook is present and cited inline to a reliable source, no bare urls, copyvio or blpvio concerns, neutral and undisputed. QPQ checks out. The hook made perfect sense after I read the article and realised "qualifying" was a noun in this context, that's probably a good thing for DYK even if it isn't just me. So, it gets the tick from me with AGF on the sourcing used for the hook, which has no bluelinks. Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Reflist-talk

  1. "Regular Shorts". The Sydney Morning Herald. Australia. 2 April 1987. p. 37.