Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1989–90 British ambulance strike"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
(clarify my comments a bit)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 7)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;13:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|1989–90 British ambulance strike}}
 
{{DYK header|1989–90 British ambulance strike}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1989–90 British ambulance strike|1989–90 British ambulance strike}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=1989–90 British ambulance strike|1989–90 British ambulance strike}}
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
{{main page image|image=West Midlands Police - Day 211 - Officers on ambulance escort duty, 1990 (14978212212).jpg|caption=A British Army ambulance with a police escort deployed during the strike|width=160<!-- Use 120 for vertical images, 140 for square images, and 160 for horizontal images-->}}<!--See [[Template:Main page image]] for other parameters-->
+
{{main page image|image=West Midlands Police - Day 211 - Officers on ambulance escort duty, 1990 (14978212212).jpg|caption=A British Army ambulance with a police escort deployed during the strike|width=160}}
</div><!--
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that during the '''[[1989–90 British ambulance strike]]''' army ambulances ''(pictured)'' were deployed?  <small>"In response, they deployed army and police ambulances." from page 132 of {{cite journal |last1=Kerr |first1=Allan |last2=Sachdev |first2=Sanjit |title=Third among Equals: An Analysis of the 1989 Ambulance Dispute |journal=British Journal of Industrial Relations |date=1992 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=127–143 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |language=en |issn=1467-8543}}</small>
 
* ... that during the '''[[1989–90 British ambulance strike]]''' army ambulances ''(pictured)'' were deployed?  <small>"In response, they deployed army and police ambulances." from page 132 of {{cite journal |last1=Kerr |first1=Allan |last2=Sachdev |first2=Sanjit |title=Third among Equals: An Analysis of the 1989 Ambulance Dispute |journal=British Journal of Industrial Relations |date=1992 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=127–143 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |language=en |issn=1467-8543}}</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':<s>... that at no time during the '''[[1989–90 British ambulance strike]]''' did polls show more than 10% support for the government?  <small>"All the opinion polls conducted during the dispute found that at least four-fifths of the public supported the ambulance workers, and this support included up to three-quarters of Conservative voters. At best, only a tenth supported the government, and the polls suggested that the dispute was a major factor in the unpopularity of the government." from page 140 of: {{cite journal |last1=Kerr |first1=Allan |last2=Sachdev |first2=Sanjit |title=Third among Equals: An Analysis of the 1989 Ambulance Dispute |journal=British Journal of Industrial Relations |date=1992 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=127–143 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |language=en |issn=1467-8543}}</small></s>
 
** '''ALT1''':<s>... that at no time during the '''[[1989–90 British ambulance strike]]''' did polls show more than 10% support for the government?  <small>"All the opinion polls conducted during the dispute found that at least four-fifths of the public supported the ambulance workers, and this support included up to three-quarters of Conservative voters. At best, only a tenth supported the government, and the polls suggested that the dispute was a major factor in the unpopularity of the government." from page 140 of: {{cite journal |last1=Kerr |first1=Allan |last2=Sachdev |first2=Sanjit |title=Third among Equals: An Analysis of the 1989 Ambulance Dispute |journal=British Journal of Industrial Relations |date=1992 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=127–143 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x |language=en |issn=1467-8543}}</small></s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2nd and 6th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2nd and 6th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)]]
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self-nominated at 07:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self-nominated at 07:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|1989–90 British ambulance strike|Dumelow|subpage=1989–90 British ambulance strike}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough (in mainspace). Long enough. The image is suitable for the front page. Both hooks are interesting, and AGF on the sourcing, although the first hook is confirmed elsewhere, [https://apnews.com/d426f4f1ae5dacaa220df03ff2ed95cb Army Takes Over Britain’s Emergency Ambulance Operations]. The second hook may be somewhat ambiguous. Is the no more than 10% support just in respect of the government vs the ambulance drivers, or  overall in respect of its handling of the economy etc? Of course, we can only really use the photo with the first hook. All paras well-cited. QPQ done. NPOV maintained. Earwig's Copyvio Detector found no issues. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 23:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough (in mainspace). Long enough. The image is suitable for the front page. Both hooks are interesting, and AGF on the sourcing, although the first hook is confirmed elsewhere, [https://apnews.com/d426f4f1ae5dacaa220df03ff2ed95cb Army Takes Over Britain’s Emergency Ambulance Operations]. The second hook may be somewhat ambiguous. Is the no more than 10% support just in respect of the government vs the ambulance drivers, or  overall in respect of its handling of the economy etc? Of course, we can only really use the photo with the first hook. All paras well-cited. QPQ done. NPOV maintained. Earwig's Copyvio Detector found no issues. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 23:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 18:
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] It's a long time ago, but I do remember the army ambulances. Thank you for a stroll down memory lane. As for the 10% support, that would have been just in respect of the government vs the ambulance drivers; the article provides that level of nuance. Looking at the Google Docs spreadsheet available from this link, polling in 12/1989 and 1/1990 put the Conservatives on 37% and 38%: [https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/oct/21/icm-poll-data-labour-conservatives Guardian/ICM polls: every one since 1984]. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 09:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] It's a long time ago, but I do remember the army ambulances. Thank you for a stroll down memory lane. As for the 10% support, that would have been just in respect of the government vs the ambulance drivers; the article provides that level of nuance. Looking at the Google Docs spreadsheet available from this link, polling in 12/1989 and 1/1990 put the Conservatives on 37% and 38%: [https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/oct/21/icm-poll-data-labour-conservatives Guardian/ICM polls: every one since 1984]. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 09:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 13:05, 7 July 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

1989–90 British ambulance strike

A British Army ambulance with a police escort deployed during the strike
A British Army ambulance with a police escort deployed during the strike
  • ... that during the 1989–90 British ambulance strike army ambulances (pictured) were deployed? "In response, they deployed army and police ambulances." from page 132 of Kerr, Allan; Sachdev, Sanjit (1992). "Third among Equals: An Analysis of the 1989 Ambulance Dispute". British Journal of Industrial Relations. 30 (1): 127–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.1992.tb00767.x. ISSN 1467-8543.

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 07:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough (in mainspace). Long enough. The image is suitable for the front page. Both hooks are interesting, and AGF on the sourcing, although the first hook is confirmed elsewhere, Army Takes Over Britain’s Emergency Ambulance Operations. The second hook may be somewhat ambiguous. Is the no more than 10% support just in respect of the government vs the ambulance drivers, or overall in respect of its handling of the economy etc? Of course, we can only really use the photo with the first hook. All paras well-cited. QPQ done. NPOV maintained. Earwig's Copyvio Detector found no issues. Edwardx (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Edwardx, thanks for the review. There is no further detail on what question the polls asked. I am more than happy for ALT0 to run (the army involvement was what first brought the strike to my attention) and have struck ALT1 - Dumelow (talk) 04:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg It's a long time ago, but I do remember the army ambulances. Thank you for a stroll down memory lane. As for the 10% support, that would have been just in respect of the government vs the ambulance drivers; the article provides that level of nuance. Looking at the Google Docs spreadsheet available from this link, polling in 12/1989 and 1/1990 put the Conservatives on 37% and 38%: Guardian/ICM polls: every one since 1984. Edwardx (talk) 09:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)