Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/1 point player"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Redtigerxyz (merge ?) |
imported>PeterJeremy (Reorder links and add my comments) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | {{*mp}}... that disability sport classifications include '''[[1 point player]]''', '''[[2 point player]]''', '''[[3 point player]]''', '''[[4 point player]]''', '''[[4.5 point player]]''', '''[[S1 (classification)|S1]]''', '''[[ | + | {{*mp}}... that disability sport classifications include '''[[1 point player]]''', '''[[2 point player]]''', '''[[3 point player]]''', '''[[4 point player]]''', '''[[4.5 point player]]''', '''[[S1 (classification)|S1]]''', '''[[S2 (classification)|S2]]''', '''[[S3 (classification)|S3]]''', '''[[S4 (classification)|S4]]''', '''[[S5 (classification)|S5]]''', '''[[S6 (classification)|S6]]''', '''[[S7 (classification)|S7]]''', '''[[S8 (classification)|S8]]''', '''[[S9 (classification)|S9]]''', '''[[S10 (classification)|S10]]''', '''[[S11 (classification)|S11]]''', '''[[S12 (classification)|S12]]''', '''[[S13 (classification)|S13]]''', '''[[T11 (classification)|T11]]''', '''[[T12 (classification)|T12]]''', '''[[T13 (classification)|T13]]''', '''[[T20 (classification)|T20]]''', '''[[T31 (classification)|T31]]''', '''[[T32 (classification)|T32]]''', '''[[T33 (classification)|T33]]''', '''[[T34 (classification)|T34]]''', '''[[T35 (classification)|T35]]''', '''[[T36 (classification)|T36]]''', '''[[T37 (classification)|T37]]''', '''[[T38 (classification)|T38]]''', '''[[T40 (classification)|T40]]''', '''[[T42 (classification)|T42]]''', '''[[T43 (classification)|T43]]''', '''[[T44 (classification)|T44]]''', '''[[T45 (classification)|T45]]''', '''[[T46 (classification)|T46]]''', '''[[T51 (classification)|T51]]''', '''[[T52 (classification)|T52]]''', '''[[T53 (classification)|T53]]''' and '''[[T54 (classification)|T54]]'''? |
* Do we need so many articles with repetitive content? Many sections like History, Getting classified are same, in case of swimming. "Sport" is similar, each with a definition of Jane Buckley in case of swimming. I suggest a merge into 3 articles: "Wheelchair basketball classifications" (with all point player article), "Disability swimming classifications" (with the S) and "Disability athletics classifications" (with the T).--[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 06:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | * Do we need so many articles with repetitive content? Many sections like History, Getting classified are same, in case of swimming. "Sport" is similar, each with a definition of Jane Buckley in case of swimming. I suggest a merge into 3 articles: "Wheelchair basketball classifications" (with all point player article), "Disability swimming classifications" (with the S) and "Disability athletics classifications" (with the T).--[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 06:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | * I think re-organising the swimming classifications as per the above makes it read better. That said, I feel the DYK contains too much detail in its current form and something like "5 wheelchair basketball, 13 swimming and 22 track classifications" is a more reasonable level of detail for the general reader. Looking at the underlying articles, I tend to agree with [[User:Redtigerxyz]] that they contain a significant degree of overlap and could reasonably be merged into 3 articles. --[[User:PeterJeremy|PeterJeremy]] ([[User talk:PeterJeremy|talk]]) 08:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Revision as of 08:05, 20 November 2011
1 point player
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: 2 point player
- 3 point player
- 4 point player
- 4.5 point player
- S1 (classification)
- S10 (classification)
- S11 (classification)
- S12 (classification)
- S13 (classification)
- S2 (classification)
- S3 (classification)
- S4 (classification)
- S5 (classification)
- S6 (classification)
- S7 (classification)
- S8 (classification)
- S9 (classification)
- T11 (classification)
- T12 (classification)
- T13 (classification)
- T20 (classification)
- T31 (classification)
- T32 (classification)
- T33 (classification)
- T34 (classification)
- T35 (classification)
- T36 (classification)
- T37 (classification)
- T38 (classification)
- T40 (classification)
- T42 (classification)
- T43 (classification)
- T44 (classification)
- T45 (classification)
- T46 (classification)
- T51 (classification)
- T52 (classification)
- T53 (classification)
- T54 (classification) )
- ... that disability sport classifications include 1 point player, 2 point player, 3 point player, 4 point player, 4.5 point player, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, T11, T12, T13, T20, T31, T32, T33, T34, T35, T36, T37, T38, T40, T42, T43, T44, T45, T46, T51, T52, T53 and T54?
- Do we need so many articles with repetitive content? Many sections like History, Getting classified are same, in case of swimming. "Sport" is similar, each with a definition of Jane Buckley in case of swimming. I suggest a merge into 3 articles: "Wheelchair basketball classifications" (with all point player article), "Disability swimming classifications" (with the S) and "Disability athletics classifications" (with the T).--Redtigerxyz Talk 06:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- I think re-organising the swimming classifications as per the above makes it read better. That said, I feel the DYK contains too much detail in its current form and something like "5 wheelchair basketball, 13 swimming and 22 track classifications" is a more reasonable level of detail for the general reader. Looking at the underlying articles, I tend to agree with User:Redtigerxyz that they contain a significant degree of overlap and could reasonably be merged into 3 articles. --PeterJeremy (talk) 08:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed: UCF Knights women's soccer
- Comment:
Created/expanded by LauraHale (talk). Nominated by Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)