Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2011 in politics"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Muboshgu
(re)
imported>Jaobar
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This has been significantly expanded. DYKcheck doesn't count bulleted items such as this but I do. However, many of these items are unsourced, and at least one requires clarification. I stopped reviewing where I stopped tagging, while I await referencing for all items. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This has been significantly expanded. DYKcheck doesn't count bulleted items such as this but I do. However, many of these items are unsourced, and at least one requires clarification. I stopped reviewing where I stopped tagging, while I await referencing for all items. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
::* Dear [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]], thank you for your review and for your comments. I looked through the article and see only 5 "citation needed" requests from almost 200 bullet points (and citations) added. If you don't mind my saying, this suggests to me that your comment "many of these items are unsourced" is an overstatement. I will email the individual that expanded the article today and request that these additions be added right away. This shouldn't be a problem as there are only a few instances where citations are missing. I hope that once this is completed that you will update your review and we can hopefully move this process forward. Thanks again. Best, [[User:Jaobar|Jaobar]] ([[User talk:Jaobar|talk]]) 21:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
+
::* Dear [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]], thank you for your review and for your comments. I looked through the article and see only a few (10 or so) "citation needed" requests and other missing citations from almost 200 bullet points and citations added. If you don't mind my saying, this suggests to me that your comment "many of these items are unsourced" is an overstatement. I will email the individual that expanded the article today and request that these additions be added right away. This shouldn't be a problem as there are only a few instances where citations are missing. I hope that once this is completed that you will update your review and we can hopefully move this process forward. Thanks again. Best, [[User:Jaobar|Jaobar]] ([[User talk:Jaobar|talk]]) 21:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*Like I said, I stopped reviewing part way through. I can add the rest, because the items of June 5, September 21, and December 26 need sources. There is also the matter of the QPQ review that needs to be completed. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*Like I said, I stopped reviewing part way through. I can add the rest, because the items of June 5, September 21, and December 26 need sources. There is also the matter of the QPQ review that needs to be completed. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 +
::::*I have updated my comments to reflect your clarification. I have emailed the student and expect to see edits soon. I will add a comment here once edits have been made. Thanks again for your help with this. Best, [[User:Jaobar|Jaobar]] ([[User talk:Jaobar|talk]]) 21:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:44, 19 January 2017

2011 in politics

Kim Jong-Il
Kim Jong-Il


5x expanded by ThatGuyJabbles (talk). Nominated by Jaobar (talk) at 04:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg This has been significantly expanded. DYKcheck doesn't count bulleted items such as this but I do. However, many of these items are unsourced, and at least one requires clarification. I stopped reviewing where I stopped tagging, while I await referencing for all items. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Dear Muboshgu, thank you for your review and for your comments. I looked through the article and see only a few (10 or so) "citation needed" requests and other missing citations from almost 200 bullet points and citations added. If you don't mind my saying, this suggests to me that your comment "many of these items are unsourced" is an overstatement. I will email the individual that expanded the article today and request that these additions be added right away. This shouldn't be a problem as there are only a few instances where citations are missing. I hope that once this is completed that you will update your review and we can hopefully move this process forward. Thanks again. Best, Jaobar (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Like I said, I stopped reviewing part way through. I can add the rest, because the items of June 5, September 21, and December 26 need sources. There is also the matter of the QPQ review that needs to be completed. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  • I have updated my comments to reflect your clarification. I have emailed the student and expect to see edits soon. I will add a comment here once edits have been made. Thanks again for your help with this. Best, Jaobar (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)