Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2013–14 Charlotte Checkers season"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(ALT1 hook needs review)
imported>ZappaOMatic
(Good)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  ALT1 hook needs review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 20:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 
::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  ALT1 hook needs review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 20:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 
+
:::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yup, now it's fine. '''<span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">[[User:ZappaOMati|<font color="#0000FF">Zappa</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ZappaOMati|<font color="#00FF00">O</font>]][[User talk:ZappaOMati|<font color="#FF0000">Mati</font>]]</span>''' 02:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:34, 3 December 2013

2013–14 Charlotte Checkers season

  • ... that the Charlotte Checkers ice hockey team went five away games without a regulation loss, but lost a franchise-worst six straight home games in their 2013–14 season?
  • Reviewed: Tim Weed
  • Comment: The redirect was created some time ago, but the content of the article is new.

Created/expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nominated at 14:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Long enough, new enough, and sources check out fine, though I'm somewhat concerned regarding the hook. The hook states that the Checkers went five away games without a loss in regulation, though I feel like some could misread that as "five consecutive away games", though the Checkers had also lost to the Griffins on the road in regulation. Can you rephrase the hook to make it more clear? ZappaOMati 01:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Is simply adding the word "consecutive" sufficient?