Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2015 Football League Cup Final"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Fuebaey
(accept)
imported>The Almightey Drill
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough (27 Jan) and long enough (~4.3k chars). Sourced, neutral with no apparent copyvio. Hook is stated and cited to [http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/football/30765878 this BBC match commentary] (or [http://www1.skysports.com/football/live/match/329965/report this] more stable report). QPQ done. Good for the 1st March, preferably before kick off (16:00 UTC). One question though, I've used the first revision by {{U|Arbero}} to calculate the fivefold expansion (it doesn't qualify otherwise). Is there a reason why they are left out of the credits? I get that the majority of the text was written by {{U|The Almightey Drill}} in late December and uncommented a month later but, going through the history, I think they have done as much to the article as the nominator to warrant equal credit. [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 01:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough (27 Jan) and long enough (~4.3k chars). Sourced, neutral with no apparent copyvio. Hook is stated and cited to [http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/football/30765878 this BBC match commentary] (or [http://www1.skysports.com/football/live/match/329965/report this] more stable report). QPQ done. Good for the 1st March, preferably before kick off (16:00 UTC). One question though, I've used the first revision by {{U|Arbero}} to calculate the fivefold expansion (it doesn't qualify otherwise). Is there a reason why they are left out of the credits? I get that the majority of the text was written by {{U|The Almightey Drill}} in late December and uncommented a month later but, going through the history, I think they have done as much to the article as the nominator to warrant equal credit. [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 01:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
::''Comment'': I would like [[User:Arbero]] credited for this, he has made a significant amount of editing to it [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 20:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:46, 1 February 2015

2015 Football League Cup Final

  • Reviewed: Tor Wager
  • Comment: For 1 March (the date of the final).

5x expanded by The Almightey Drill (talk), The C of E (talk). Nominated by The C of E (talk) at 22:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough (27 Jan) and long enough (~4.3k chars). Sourced, neutral with no apparent copyvio. Hook is stated and cited to this BBC match commentary (or this more stable report). QPQ done. Good for the 1st March, preferably before kick off (16:00 UTC). One question though, I've used the first revision by Template:U to calculate the fivefold expansion (it doesn't qualify otherwise). Is there a reason why they are left out of the credits? I get that the majority of the text was written by Template:U in late December and uncommented a month later but, going through the history, I think they have done as much to the article as the nominator to warrant equal credit. Fuebaey (talk) 01:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment: I would like User:Arbero credited for this, he has made a significant amount of editing to it '''tAD''' (talk) 20:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)