Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Six-red World Championship"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(QPQ requires that a review covers all the DYK criteria and an icon be given)
imported>Epicgenius
(re)
Line 43: Line 43:
 
::::I don't think it matters too much. The reviews normally change a lot between the initial review and it being on main page anyway, I doubt this would all work if we forced every review to get to that stage for QPQ. Best Wishes, '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 13:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 
::::I don't think it matters too much. The reviews normally change a lot between the initial review and it being on main page anyway, I doubt this would all work if we forced every review to get to that stage for QPQ. Best Wishes, '''[[User:Lee Vilenski|<span style="color:green">Lee Vilenski</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Lee Vilenski|contribs]])</sup>''' 13:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::[[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]], [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::[[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]], [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 +
::::::{{u|BlueMoonset}}, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if {{u|Lee Vilenski}} has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:59, 12 September 2019

2019 Six-red World Championship

Created by Lee Vilenski (talk). Self-nominated at 22:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

Added a QPQ which I am reviewing now: Template:U Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Re Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go now. I don't think it matters that you finished a review, just that you started it. I may be wrong, though, but trust that you will actually finish that QPQ. epicgenius (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't think it matters too much. The reviews normally change a lot between the initial review and it being on main page anyway, I doubt this would all work if we forced every review to get to that stage for QPQ. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Lee Vilenski, epicgenius, in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:U, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if Template:U has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. epicgenius (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)