Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Six-red World Championship"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(reply to epicgenius)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|2019 Six-red World Championship}}
 
{{DYK header|2019 Six-red World Championship}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2019 Six-red World Championship|2019 Six-red World Championship}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2019 Six-red World Championship|2019 Six-red World Championship}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the winners of the [[2019 World Cup (snooker)|2019 World Cup]] doubles snooker event competed as opponents in the final of the '''[[2019 Six-red World Championship]]'''? <small>Source: http://worldsnooker.com/six-red-king-maguire-ends-five-year-drought/</small>
 
* ... that the winners of the [[2019 World Cup (snooker)|2019 World Cup]] doubles snooker event competed as opponents in the final of the '''[[2019 Six-red World Championship]]'''? <small>Source: http://worldsnooker.com/six-red-king-maguire-ends-five-year-drought/</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019]]
 
:* ''Comment'': In process of re-wording article and expanding, but should meet the criteria.
 
:* ''Comment'': In process of re-wording article and expanding, but should meet the criteria.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]] ([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]]). Self-nominated at 22:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]] ([[User talk:Lee Vilenski|talk]]). Self-nominated at 22:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|2019 Six-red World Championship|Lee Vilenski|subpage=2019 Six-red World Championship}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* {{re|Lee Vilenski}} I'll review this one. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 00:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 
:* {{re|Lee Vilenski}} I'll review this one. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 00:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Line 44: Line 36:
 
:::::[[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]], [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::[[User:Lee Vilenski|Lee Vilenski]], [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 
::::::{{u|BlueMoonset}}, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if {{u|Lee Vilenski}} has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 
::::::{{u|BlueMoonset}}, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if {{u|Lee Vilenski}} has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
:::::::[[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], I think at this point, since the only thing that is missing from the QPQ is the icon and neither of you seem to have been aware that it was needed, there's no need to revoke the tick here. Lee Vilenski will surely put it in place shortly (and if they forget, the eventual promoter will likely remind them before this goes to prep). [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)  
+
:::::::[[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], I think at this point, since the only thing that is missing from the QPQ is the icon and neither of you seem to have been aware that it was needed, there's no need to revoke the tick here. Lee Vilenski will surely put it in place shortly (and if they forget, the eventual promoter will likely remind them before this goes to prep). [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 06:13, 25 September 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

2019 Six-red World Championship

Created by Lee Vilenski (talk). Self-nominated at 22:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

Added a QPQ which I am reviewing now: Template:U Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Re Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go now. I don't think it matters that you finished a review, just that you started it. I may be wrong, though, but trust that you will actually finish that QPQ. epicgenius (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't think it matters too much. The reviews normally change a lot between the initial review and it being on main page anyway, I doubt this would all work if we forced every review to get to that stage for QPQ. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Lee Vilenski, epicgenius, in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:U, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if Template:U has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. epicgenius (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
epicgenius, I think at this point, since the only thing that is missing from the QPQ is the icon and neither of you seem to have been aware that it was needed, there's no need to revoke the tick here. Lee Vilenski will surely put it in place shortly (and if they forget, the eventual promoter will likely remind them before this goes to prep). BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)