Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2020 AV2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nrco0e (bolded) |
imported>MB (review) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* < | + | :* New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [''(pictured)'']. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:MB|<b style="color:#00FF00">MB</b>]] 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
| + | |||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 03:57, 14 January 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2020 AV2
- ... that the near-Earth object Template:Mpl is the first asteroid discovered to have an orbit entirely inside that of Venus? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
- ALT1:... that the near-Earth object Template:Mpl is the first asteroid found that has an orbit entirely inside that of Venus? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
- ALT2:... that Template:Mpl is the first asteroid discovered to have an inter-Venusian orbit? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
Created by Nrco0e (talk). Self-nominated at 00:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [(pictured)]. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2.
MB 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [(pictured)]. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2.
