Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/2020 AV2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>MB (review) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 6) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|2020 AV2}} | {{DYK header|2020 AV2}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Asteroid 2020 AV2.jpg|caption=Long-exposure telescope image of {{mp|2020 AV|2}} (center)|width=133x150}} | {{main page image|image=Asteroid 2020 AV2.jpg|caption=Long-exposure telescope image of {{mp|2020 AV|2}} (center)|width=133x150}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the [[near-Earth object]] '''{{mpl|2020 AV|2}}''' is the first asteroid discovered to have an orbit entirely inside that of [[Venus]]? <small>Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." [https://www.virtualtelescope.eu/2020/01/09/2020-av2-the-first-intervenusian-asteroid-ever-discovered-an-mage-08-jan-2020/ Virtual Telescope Project]</small> | * ... that the [[near-Earth object]] '''{{mpl|2020 AV|2}}''' is the first asteroid discovered to have an orbit entirely inside that of [[Venus]]? <small>Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." [https://www.virtualtelescope.eu/2020/01/09/2020-av2-the-first-intervenusian-asteroid-ever-discovered-an-mage-08-jan-2020/ Virtual Telescope Project]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that the [[near-Earth object]] '''{{mpl|2020 AV|2}}''' is the first asteroid found that has an orbit entirely inside that of [[Venus]]? <small>Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." [https://www.virtualtelescope.eu/2020/01/09/2020-av2-the-first-intervenusian-asteroid-ever-discovered-an-mage-08-jan-2020/ Virtual Telescope Project]</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that the [[near-Earth object]] '''{{mpl|2020 AV|2}}''' is the first asteroid found that has an orbit entirely inside that of [[Venus]]? <small>Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." [https://www.virtualtelescope.eu/2020/01/09/2020-av2-the-first-intervenusian-asteroid-ever-discovered-an-mage-08-jan-2020/ Virtual Telescope Project]</small> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 14: | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Nrco0e|Nrco0e]] ([[User talk:Nrco0e|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Nrco0e|Nrco0e]] ([[User talk:Nrco0e|talk]]). Self-nominated at 00:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [''(pictured)'']. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:MB|<b style="color:#00FF00">MB</b>]] 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC) | :* New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [''(pictured)'']. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:MB|<b style="color:#00FF00">MB</b>]] 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::*I am promoting a revised version of the hooks, as the ALT2 wording {{tq|an inter-Venusian orbit}} is too technical for casual readers: | ||
| + | ::*... that '''{{mpl|2020 AV|2}}''' is the first asteroid ever found to have an orbit completely within [[Venus]]{{'}} orbit? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | {{-}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:54, 28 January 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2020 AV2
- ... that the near-Earth object Template:Mpl is the first asteroid discovered to have an orbit entirely inside that of Venus? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
- ALT1:... that the near-Earth object Template:Mpl is the first asteroid found that has an orbit entirely inside that of Venus? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
- ALT2:... that Template:Mpl is the first asteroid discovered to have an inter-Venusian orbit? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
Created by Nrco0e (talk). Self-nominated at 00:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [(pictured)]. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2.
MB 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- I am promoting a revised version of the hooks, as the ALT2 wording Template:Tq is too technical for casual readers:
- ... that Template:Mpl is the first asteroid ever found to have an orbit completely within Venus' orbit? Yoninah (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [(pictured)]. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2.
