Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(promoted to prep 1)
imported>Steel1943
(Remove unnecessary category tag as this page is also placed in a subcategory of the removed parent category)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:DYK/Successful nominations&nbsp;from February 2013]] [[Category:DYK/Successful nominations|66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division]] [[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from February 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:DYK/Successful nominations&nbsp;from February 2013]] [[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from February 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
 
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
 
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
  

Revision as of 17:05, 14 June 2016

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of 66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division

5x expanded by Andrew Gray (talk). Self nom at 10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Length, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters". It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses. If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. SpinningSpark 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
  • The two numbers are both given by the source, and I don't think it's much of OR to conclude that they're approximately in a 3:1 ratio. I'll have a think about this. Andrew Gray (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Looking at the source again more carefully, I think I can agree that this is allowable as a WP:CALC case. Good to go, well done. SpinningSpark 16:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)