Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jonesey95 |
imported>Ahechtbot m (Task 5: Fix LintErrors) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Andrew Gray|Andrew Gray]] ([[User talk:Andrew Gray|talk]]). Self nom at 10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Andrew Gray|Andrew Gray]] ([[User talk:Andrew Gray|talk]]). Self nom at 10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
− | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Length, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters". It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses. If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark | + | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Length, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters". It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses. If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark</font>]]''' 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC) |
::*The two numbers are both given by the source, and I don't think it's much of OR to conclude that they're approximately in a 3:1 ratio. I'll have a think about this. [[User:Andrew Gray|Andrew Gray]] ([[User talk:Andrew Gray|talk]]) 09:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | ::*The two numbers are both given by the source, and I don't think it's much of OR to conclude that they're approximately in a 3:1 ratio. I'll have a think about this. [[User:Andrew Gray|Andrew Gray]] ([[User talk:Andrew Gray|talk]]) 09:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
− | :::* [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Looking at the source again more carefully, I think I can agree that this is allowable as a [[WP:CALC]] case. Good to go, well done. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark | + | :::* [[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Looking at the source again more carefully, I think I can agree that this is allowable as a [[WP:CALC]] case. Good to go, well done. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark</font>]]''' 16:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 17:46, 9 April 2019
The following is an archived discussion of 66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC).
66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division
- ... that the 66th (2nd East Lancashire) Division of the British Army lost almost three-quarters of its strength during the first ten days of the Spring Offensive in March 1918?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/SS Sirius (1885)
- Comment: Hook detail is in the second two paras of the "Western Front" section. Expanded 5x (hopefully!) and new version moved into mainspace on 10/2.
5x expanded by Andrew Gray (talk). Self nom at 10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Length, date, and hook length are ok, but neither the article, nor the reference states the losses as "three-quarters". It takes some OR to arrive at that from the raw numbers of losses. If another source cannot be found perhaps the easiest thing would be to modify the hook in line with the article. SpinningSpark 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- The two numbers are both given by the source, and I don't think it's much of OR to conclude that they're approximately in a 3:1 ratio. I'll have a think about this. Andrew Gray (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)