Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(format template after page move)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;22:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)}}
 
{{DYK header|9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)|9th Missouri Infantry Regiment}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)|9th Missouri Infantry Regiment}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that when originally organized, the '''[[9th Missouri Infantry Regiment]]''' contained only eight [[Company (military unit)|companies]], which violated [[Confederate States Army|Confederate]] regulations?  <small> source 1 in the text</small>
 
* ... that when originally organized, the '''[[9th Missouri Infantry Regiment]]''' contained only eight [[Company (military unit)|companies]], which violated [[Confederate States Army|Confederate]] regulations?  <small> source 1 in the text</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that a number of the men who served in the '''[[9th Missouri Infantry Regiment]]''' were actually from [[Arkansas]]?  <small> source 1 in the text </small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that a number of the men who served in the '''[[9th Missouri Infantry Regiment]]''' were actually from [[Arkansas]]?  <small> source 1 in the text </small>
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': If it's deemed that '''ALT1''' doesn't make any sense to readers without a background knowledge of US geography, I'm fine with striking it.  I'm working on a series of Missouri Confederate articles, I think this is like the 13th DYK nom in the series, and I'm kinda running out of interesting things to say about these units.
 
:* ''Comment'': If it's deemed that '''ALT1''' doesn't make any sense to readers without a background knowledge of US geography, I'm fine with striking it.  I'm working on a series of Missouri Confederate articles, I think this is like the 13th DYK nom in the series, and I'm kinda running out of interesting things to say about these units.
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] ([[User talk:Hog Farm|talk]]). Self-nominated at 03:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] ([[User talk:Hog Farm|talk]]). Self-nominated at 03:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|9th Missouri Infantry Regiment|Hog Farm|subpage=9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)}}
 
-->
 
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]], review follows: article created 19 June; article is of good length, well written and cited inline throughout to offline, reliable sources; all sources are offline but I am happy to AGF there is no copyright violation from these; both hooks are mentioned in the article and cited reliably and both are interesting (to me at least!); a QPQ has been carried out.  Another excellently written and interesting article, thanks for your work on these - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 18:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]], review follows: article created 19 June; article is of good length, well written and cited inline throughout to offline, reliable sources; all sources are offline but I am happy to AGF there is no copyright violation from these; both hooks are mentioned in the article and cited reliably and both are interesting (to me at least!); a QPQ has been carried out.  Another excellently written and interesting article, thanks for your work on these - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 18:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 22:08, 16 July 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

9th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ryan T. Anderson
  • Comment: If it's deemed that ALT1 doesn't make any sense to readers without a background knowledge of US geography, I'm fine with striking it. I'm working on a series of Missouri Confederate articles, I think this is like the 13th DYK nom in the series, and I'm kinda running out of interesting things to say about these units.

Moved to mainspace by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 03:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Hi Hog Farm, review follows: article created 19 June; article is of good length, well written and cited inline throughout to offline, reliable sources; all sources are offline but I am happy to AGF there is no copyright violation from these; both hooks are mentioned in the article and cited reliably and both are interesting (to me at least!); a QPQ has been carried out. Another excellently written and interesting article, thanks for your work on these - Dumelow (talk) 18:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)