Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/AWE"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DoctorKubla |
imported>Allen3 (to prep2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 14:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Awe==== | ====Awe==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=AWE|Awe}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=AWE|Awe}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the emotion of '''[[awe]]''' could be evolutionarily adaptive? | * ... that the emotion of '''[[awe]]''' could be evolutionarily adaptive? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* <b>ALT1</b>:... that there is controversy over whether non-religious people can experience the emotion of '''[[awe]]'''? | :* <b>ALT1</b>:... that there is controversy over whether non-religious people can experience the emotion of '''[[awe]]'''? | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Call me Lucy|Call me Lucy]] ([[User talk:Call me Lucy|talk]]). Self nominated at 04:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Call me Lucy|Call me Lucy]] ([[User talk:Call me Lucy|talk]]). Self nominated at 04:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The "DYK check" tool says this article has gone from 2,476 characters to 10,617 characters, and therefore hasn't been 5x expanded. However, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Awe&oldid=576491747 pre-expansion version] of the article contained a list of acronyms that shouldn't really count as readable prose, and didn't really belong in the article; without the acronyms, the character count comes to 2,103 (according to Microsoft Word), so the article as it stands can be considered a fivefold expansion. Now, as for the other criteria: The article is well-sourced and well-written (although the current events section needs some attention – ideally, it should summarize the arguments made by various authors rather than just instructing the reader to follow the links). Some spot checks didn't turn up any copyvio or close paraphrasing. First time nominator, so no QPQ is needed. Both hooks are accurate and cited in the article, but the original hook's a bit bland; I think ALT1 is more likely to draw people in. [[User:DoctorKubla|DoctorKubla]] ([[User talk:DoctorKubla|talk]]) 12:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 14:01, 3 December 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 14:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Awe
- ... that the emotion of awe could be evolutionarily adaptive?
- ALT1:... that there is controversy over whether non-religious people can experience the emotion of awe?
5x expanded by Call me Lucy (talk). Self nominated at 04:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC).
- 16px The "DYK check" tool says this article has gone from 2,476 characters to 10,617 characters, and therefore hasn't been 5x expanded. However, the pre-expansion version of the article contained a list of acronyms that shouldn't really count as readable prose, and didn't really belong in the article; without the acronyms, the character count comes to 2,103 (according to Microsoft Word), so the article as it stands can be considered a fivefold expansion. Now, as for the other criteria: The article is well-sourced and well-written (although the current events section needs some attention – ideally, it should summarize the arguments made by various authors rather than just instructing the reader to follow the links). Some spot checks didn't turn up any copyvio or close paraphrasing. First time nominator, so no QPQ is needed. Both hooks are accurate and cited in the article, but the original hook's a bit bland; I think ALT1 is more likely to draw people in. DoctorKubla (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)