Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/A Cure for Pokeritis"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Taylor Trescott
m (indent)
imported>Crisco 1492
(re)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
::*The original hook does ''not'' violate that rule, which is intended to prevent hooks such as ... that a woman arranged a fake police raid on her husband's weekly poker game to '''[[A Cure for Pokeritis|cure him of pokeritis]]'''? The original hook, in saying what a film is about, ''does'' involve the real world. [[User:Mandarax|<span style="color:green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></span>]]&nbsp;<span style="color:blue">•</span>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<span style="color:#999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</span>]] 18:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 
::*The original hook does ''not'' violate that rule, which is intended to prevent hooks such as ... that a woman arranged a fake police raid on her husband's weekly poker game to '''[[A Cure for Pokeritis|cure him of pokeritis]]'''? The original hook, in saying what a film is about, ''does'' involve the real world. [[User:Mandarax|<span style="color:green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></span>]]&nbsp;<span style="color:blue">•</span>&nbsp;[[User talk:Mandarax|<span style="color:#999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</span>]] 18:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 
::::Not what I heard from [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] over [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Lost Tribe (1949 film)|here]]. So which is it? '''''[[User:Taylor Trescott|<span style="color:#B6B3FF; font-family: Courier">Taylor Trescott</span>]]''''' - <sup>[[User talk:Taylor Trescott|my talk]]</sup> + <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Taylor Trescott|my edits]]</sub> 19:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 
::::Not what I heard from [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] over [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Lost Tribe (1949 film)|here]]. So which is it? '''''[[User:Taylor Trescott|<span style="color:#B6B3FF; font-family: Courier">Taylor Trescott</span>]]''''' - <sup>[[User talk:Taylor Trescott|my talk]]</sup> + <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Taylor Trescott|my edits]]</sub> 19:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
::::*There is minimal real-world involvement here, but I think it's enough. "1912 short film" makes it perfectly clear that this is a work of fiction, and that the events are fictional, and that this film was released in 1912. That's the real world right there.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 01:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:57, 27 September 2013

A Cure for Pokeritis

  • Reviewed: Second lifetime DYK nomination, taking the exemption.

Created by Squeamish Ossifrage (talk). Self nominated at 17:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Article is new, long enough, and well-sourced; hook(s) are interesting and under 200 characters; ALT hook verified from online source, AGF for original hook. No other issues. Sasata (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
  • There is one problem - the original hook cannot be used as it goes against rule C6. An article involving a work of fiction has to have a hook which involves the real world. Unless the nom can replace it, ALT will have to be used. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 11:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
  • The original hook does not violate that rule, which is intended to prevent hooks such as ... that a woman arranged a fake police raid on her husband's weekly poker game to cure him of pokeritis? The original hook, in saying what a film is about, does involve the real world. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 18:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Not what I heard from BlueMoonset over here. So which is it? Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
  • There is minimal real-world involvement here, but I think it's enough. "1912 short film" makes it perfectly clear that this is a work of fiction, and that the events are fictional, and that this film was released in 1912. That's the real world right there. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)