Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Abdullah II of Jordan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (hook fact) |
imported>Makeandtoss |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but notice that the article takes pains to emphasis that this is Abdullah's claim that he is the 41st-generation descendant of Muhammad. Should the hook say "who claims to be"? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC) | ::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but notice that the article takes pains to emphasis that this is Abdullah's claim that he is the 41st-generation descendant of Muhammad. Should the hook say "who claims to be"? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
| + | :::{{ping|Yoninah}} both work since sources do not challenge the claim but even support it. [[User:Makeandtoss|Makeandtoss]] ([[User talk:Makeandtoss|talk]]) 07:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:46, 2 February 2018
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Abdullah II of Jordan
- ... that King Abdullah II of Jordan, a 41st-generation direct descendant of Muhammad, funded the restoration of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in 2017? [1][2][3]
Improved to Good Article status by Makeandtoss (talk). Self-nominated at 09:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC).
- 16px Article was promoted to GA within required period, is more than long enough and is within policy regarding neutrality, sourcing and avoidance of close paraphrasing (note that Earwig detected a 50.3% confidence "violation possible" that is related to a direct quote used in the article.). The hook is interesting, within length limits and properly sourced (to several different references). The image is free, appropriate, used in the article and shows up well at the designated size. QPQ obligation has been met. Alansohn (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping both work since sources do not challenge the claim but even support it. Makeandtoss (talk) 07:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)