Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Abelsonite"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris857
(nomination)
 
imported>EdChem
(review)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
+
:*''Reviewed'':
  
 +
:''Article Issues''
 +
:*Expansion is 2179/256 = 8.51... > 5x as required.
 +
:*Expansion occurred on 7 January 2012, so date requirements satisfied.
 +
:*Policy - neutrality and citations are fine.  Copyvio check to follow.
 +
:''Hook Issues''
 +
:*Sentence supporting original hook is uncited, but may be in the reference from the sentence following.
 +
:*Sentence supporting ALT1 is cited. Reference check to follow.
 +
:*Hook length is fine
 +
:*As a chemist, I find ALT1 more interesting - when thinking of substances leading to minerals, chlorophyll does not strike me as a common source.  That being the case and given the material in the article about geoporphyrins, I wonder if a better hook might be:
 +
:::'''ALT2:''' ... that the mineral '''[[abelsonite]]''' probably formed from [[chlorophyll]] and is the only known crystalline [[geoporphyrin]]?
 +
::I would be interested in the submitter's thoughts on linking to [[chlorophyll a]] rather than [[chlorophyll]].
 +
:*Hook neutrality is not a problem.
 +
:I will return and check copyvio and referencing issues later, hopefully after the submitter has added a reference for the original hook.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 11:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:38, 7 January 2013

Abelsonite

5x expanded by Chris857 (talk). Self nom at 03:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Reviewed:
Article Issues
  • Expansion is 2179/256 = 8.51... > 5x as required.
  • Expansion occurred on 7 January 2012, so date requirements satisfied.
  • Policy - neutrality and citations are fine. Copyvio check to follow.
Hook Issues
  • Sentence supporting original hook is uncited, but may be in the reference from the sentence following.
  • Sentence supporting ALT1 is cited. Reference check to follow.
  • Hook length is fine
  • As a chemist, I find ALT1 more interesting - when thinking of substances leading to minerals, chlorophyll does not strike me as a common source. That being the case and given the material in the article about geoporphyrins, I wonder if a better hook might be:
ALT2: ... that the mineral abelsonite probably formed from chlorophyll and is the only known crystalline geoporphyrin?
I would be interested in the submitter's thoughts on linking to chlorophyll a rather than chlorophyll.
  • Hook neutrality is not a problem.
I will return and check copyvio and referencing issues later, hopefully after the submitter has added a reference for the original hook. EdChem (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)