Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Abortion in Lithuania"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Allen3
imported>BlueMoonset
(no response to issues raised by nominator despite over a month's passage; rejecting nomination as unsuccessful)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 14:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Abortion in Lithuania====
 
====Abortion in Lithuania====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Abortion in Lithuania|Abortion in Lithuania}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Abortion in Lithuania|Abortion in Lithuania}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that despite 84 percent of Lithuanians supporting '''[[Abortion in Lithuania|abortion]]''', [[Government of Lithuania|the government]] is taking steps towards banning it?
 
* ... that despite 84 percent of Lithuanians supporting '''[[Abortion in Lithuania|abortion]]''', [[Government of Lithuania|the government]] is taking steps towards banning it?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/China Art Museum]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/China Art Museum]]
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 19:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 19:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Abortion in Lithuania|Thine Antique Pen}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Most things check out. My one concern is whether or not these "steps towards banning it" have progressed in the four months since the source was published - is the article still sufficiently up-to-date? Additional and recent sources may be difficult to come by. [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]]&nbsp;<sub><sup>[[user talk:violetriga|[talk]]]</sup></sub> 20:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Most things check out. My one concern is whether or not these "steps towards banning it" have progressed in the four months since the source was published - is the article still sufficiently up-to-date? Additional and recent sources may be difficult to come by. [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]]&nbsp;<sub><sup>[[user talk:violetriga|[talk]]]</sup></sub> 20:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 14:
  
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I've just pinged Thine Antique Pen for a response, though without much hope as it's been a full month since TAP's last edit. I think the article could use a copyedit. The hook might be finessed by adding "a poll showing" after "despite", but I think the sweeping use of "the government" in the hook and article is not warranted by the source: that usually refers to the prime minister and other ministers, while the source only mentions it being introduced by a minority party in parliament, and while it passed the parliament initially, there's no indication that the current government is actively supporting it. (I'd also like those more recent sources violet/riga was asking for.) If there isn't action soon, I don't think we'll have any choice but to close the nomination as unsuccessful. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I've just pinged Thine Antique Pen for a response, though without much hope as it's been a full month since TAP's last edit. I think the article could use a copyedit. The hook might be finessed by adding "a poll showing" after "despite", but I think the sweeping use of "the government" in the hook and article is not warranted by the source: that usually refers to the prime minister and other ministers, while the source only mentions it being introduced by a minority party in parliament, and while it passed the parliament initially, there's no indication that the current government is actively supporting it. (I'd also like those more recent sources violet/riga was asking for.) If there isn't action soon, I don't think we'll have any choice but to close the nomination as unsuccessful. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
:::*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues.  Nominator has been away from Wikipedia for over a month with no indication as to when he might return. --''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 13:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
+
:::*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues.  Nominator has been away from Wikipedia for over a month with no indication as to when he might return. --''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 13:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC){{#if:no|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 14:42, 4 November 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Abortion in Lithuania

  • ... that despite 84 percent of Lithuanians supporting abortion, the government is taking steps towards banning it?

Moved to mainspace by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nominated at 19:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Most things check out. My one concern is whether or not these "steps towards banning it" have progressed in the four months since the source was published - is the article still sufficiently up-to-date? Additional and recent sources may be difficult to come by. violet/riga [talk] 20:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px I would rather not have the exact figure on the main page without at least some hedging; see talk page for details. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px I've just pinged Thine Antique Pen for a response, though without much hope as it's been a full month since TAP's last edit. I think the article could use a copyedit. The hook might be finessed by adding "a poll showing" after "despite", but I think the sweeping use of "the government" in the hook and article is not warranted by the source: that usually refers to the prime minister and other ministers, while the source only mentions it being introduced by a minority party in parliament, and while it passed the parliament initially, there's no indication that the current government is actively supporting it. (I'd also like those more recent sources violet/riga was asking for.) If there isn't action soon, I don't think we'll have any choice but to close the nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues. Nominator has been away from Wikipedia for over a month with no indication as to when he might return. --Allen3 talk 13:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)