Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acacia denticulosa"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (Sure - done.) |
imported>97198 (to prep2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 15:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Acacia denticulosa==== | ====Acacia denticulosa==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Acacia denticulosa.jpg|100x100px|Acacia denticulosa]] | [[File:Acacia denticulosa.jpg|100x100px|Acacia denticulosa]] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that the threatened '''[[Acacia denticulosa|sandpaper wattle]]''' ''(pictured)'' is extinct at the site it was first collected? | * ... that the threatened '''[[Acacia denticulosa|sandpaper wattle]]''' ''(pictured)'' is extinct at the site it was first collected? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* '''ALT1''': ... that the threatened '''[[Acacia denticulosa|sandpaper wattle]]''' ''(pictured)'' flowers within a year of being grown from seed? | :* '''ALT1''': ... that the threatened '''[[Acacia denticulosa|sandpaper wattle]]''' ''(pictured)'' flowers within a year of being grown from seed? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Snowman]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Snowman]] | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] ([[User talk:Melburnian|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 07:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]), [[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] ([[User talk:Melburnian|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 07:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length (>5x), date, hook's ref verified. Img is from Commons and looks great at this size so I'd recommend making this the set's lead hook. No apparent close-paraphrasing. Interesting hook. QPQ is done. GTG. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 20:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length (>5x), date, hook's ref verified. Img is from Commons and looks great at this size so I'd recommend making this the set's lead hook. No apparent close-paraphrasing. Interesting hook. QPQ is done. GTG. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 20:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Line 28: | Line 18: | ||
::'''Comment'''. Could we have a bit earlier in the lede to the etymology of its latin name? It is well-referenced but not mentioned at first sight, which threw me: as I checked the refs and couldn't find it until I got to section 1, "Taxonomy". If that throws me it will throw others, I come as an intelligent but ignorant reader: and so do millions of others. [[User:SimonTrew|Si Trew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 22:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC) | ::'''Comment'''. Could we have a bit earlier in the lede to the etymology of its latin name? It is well-referenced but not mentioned at first sight, which threw me: as I checked the refs and couldn't find it until I got to section 1, "Taxonomy". If that throws me it will throw others, I come as an intelligent but ignorant reader: and so do millions of others. [[User:SimonTrew|Si Trew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 22:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Sure - done. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 13:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | :::Sure - done. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 13:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 15:15, 19 May 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 15:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Acacia denticulosa
- ... that the threatened sandpaper wattle (pictured) is extinct at the site it was first collected?
- ALT1: ... that the threatened sandpaper wattle (pictured) flowers within a year of being grown from seed?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Snowman
5x expanded by Casliber (talk), Melburnian (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 07:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC).
- Comment. Could we have a bit earlier in the lede to the etymology of its latin name? It is well-referenced but not mentioned at first sight, which threw me: as I checked the refs and couldn't find it until I got to section 1, "Taxonomy". If that throws me it will throw others, I come as an intelligent but ignorant reader: and so do millions of others. Si Trew (talk) 22:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
