Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acacia pycnantha"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (OK) |
imported>97198 (to prep2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 05:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Acacia pycnantha==== | ====Acacia pycnantha==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle.jpg|100x100px|Golden wattle]] | [[File:Acacia pycnantha Golden Wattle.jpg|100x100px|Golden wattle]] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*<s> ... that the presence of '''[[Acacia pycnantha|golden wattle]]''' ''(pictured)'' is positively correlated with numbers of [[swift parrot]]s overwintering in [[box–ironbark forest]] in central Victoria, Australia?</s> | *<s> ... that the presence of '''[[Acacia pycnantha|golden wattle]]''' ''(pictured)'' is positively correlated with numbers of [[swift parrot]]s overwintering in [[box–ironbark forest]] in central Victoria, Australia?</s> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': Not a self-nomination | :* ''Reviewed'': Not a self-nomination | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] ([[User talk:Melburnian|talk]]), [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) at 21:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Melburnian|Melburnian]] ([[User talk:Melburnian|talk]]), [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) at 21:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook fact is in the article but looking at the source cited, the fact is not borne out in the abstract of the paper. It might be borne out by the full text, but it would probably be better to choose a different hook.[[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 08:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook fact is in the article but looking at the source cited, the fact is not borne out in the abstract of the paper. It might be borne out by the full text, but it would probably be better to choose a different hook.[[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 08:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Line 29: | Line 18: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This newly promoted GA is long enough and new enough. The ALT1 hook is cited appropriately and the image is correctly licensed. I detected no policy issues. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This newly promoted GA is long enough and new enough. The ALT1 hook is cited appropriately and the image is correctly licensed. I detected no policy issues. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 05:58, 21 September 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 05:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Acacia pycnantha
... that the presence of golden wattle (pictured) is positively correlated with numbers of swift parrots overwintering in box–ironbark forest in central Victoria, Australia?
- Reviewed: Not a self-nomination
Improved to Good Article status by Melburnian (talk), Casliber (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 21:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC).
- 16px The hook fact is in the article but looking at the source cited, the fact is not borne out in the abstract of the paper. It might be borne out by the full text, but it would probably be better to choose a different hook.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the golden wattle (pictured) was proclaimed the floral emblem of Australia on 1st September 1988, and in 1992 this date was formally declared "National Wattle Day"? Oceanh (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- 16px This newly promoted GA is long enough and new enough. The ALT1 hook is cited appropriately and the image is correctly licensed. I detected no policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
