Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acanthurus dussumieri"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
 
imported>Muhandes
(ready to go, added an image)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
{{DYK header|Acanthurus dussumieri}}
 
{{DYK header|Acanthurus dussumieri}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Acanthurus dussumieri|Acanthurus dussumieri}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Acanthurus dussumieri|Acanthurus dussumieri}}
 +
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 +
{{main page image|image=Acanthurus dussumieri 1.jpg|caption=Adult ornate surgeonfish|width=133x150}}
 +
</div>
 
<!--
 
<!--
  
Line 11: Line 14:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that juvenile '''[[Acanthurus dussumieri|ornate surgeonfish]]''' are quite different in colouring from the adult fish?
+
* ... that juvenile '''[[Acanthurus dussumieri|ornate surgeonfish]]''' are quite different in colouring from the adult fish ''(pictured)''?
** '''ALT1''':... that juvenile '''[[Acanthurus dussumieri|ornate surgeonfish]]''' are quite different in appearance from the adult fish?
+
** '''ALT1''':... that juvenile '''[[Acanthurus dussumieri|ornate surgeonfish]]''' are quite different in appearance from the adult fish ''(pictured)''?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/BorderIrish|BorderIrish]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/BorderIrish|BorderIrish]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC).</small>
Line 19: Line 22:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] The article is long enough and 5x expansion is verified and new enough. The article includes citations to reliable sources (well, one reliable source) for each paragraph. It seems neutral and I could not detect any signs of plagiarism. The hook is interesting enough and short enough. As for its source, it is in French and while I could not find a sentence where it says specifically that juveniles are "different", it does list {{tq|Le patron de couleurs des juvéniles|q=yes}} in a separate section for {{tq|Description du juvénile|Q=yes}}, so it quite obviously considers them different. So, in a mix of AGF and common sense, I consider it sourced. Although some shape difference is also mentioned {{tq|Le corps du juvénile dessine un ovale proportionnellement moins long et plus haut que celui des adultes.|q=yes}}, there is no mention that this is significant, so I think the original hook is better and more accurate than ALT1. QPQ done, so this is ready to go. I added an image from the commons. It is free, used in the article and clear at 100px, so I see no reason not to include it. --[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes|talk]]) 13:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 13:27, 13 January 2020

Acanthurus dussumieri

Adult ornate surgeonfish
Adult ornate surgeonfish
  • ... that juvenile ornate surgeonfish are quite different in colouring from the adult fish (pictured)?
    • ALT1:... that juvenile ornate surgeonfish are quite different in appearance from the adult fish (pictured)?

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg The article is long enough and 5x expansion is verified and new enough. The article includes citations to reliable sources (well, one reliable source) for each paragraph. It seems neutral and I could not detect any signs of plagiarism. The hook is interesting enough and short enough. As for its source, it is in French and while I could not find a sentence where it says specifically that juveniles are "different", it does list Template:Tq in a separate section for Template:Tq, so it quite obviously considers them different. So, in a mix of AGF and common sense, I consider it sourced. Although some shape difference is also mentioned Template:Tq, there is no mention that this is significant, so I think the original hook is better and more accurate than ALT1. QPQ done, so this is ready to go. I added an image from the commons. It is free, used in the article and clear at 100px, so I see no reason not to include it. --Muhandes (talk) 13:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)