Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acer diabolicum"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Evrik
imported>Dodger67
(Done)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns.  The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns.  The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] {{ping|Dodger67}} did you pass this? If so, please add the appropriate tick. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] {{ping|Dodger67}} did you pass this? If so, please add the appropriate tick. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 +
** Done. ((u|evrik}} apologies for the delay. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:46, 14 January 2020

Acer diabolicum

Created by Abductive (talk). Self-nominated at 20:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns. The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

}}