Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Acer diabolicum"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(restoring tick)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]])&nbsp;06:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Acer diabolicum}}
 
{{DYK header|Acer diabolicum}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Acer diabolicum|Acer diabolicum}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Acer diabolicum|Acer diabolicum}}
 
<div class="dyk-img" style="float: right; margin-left: 0.5em;">
 
<div class="dyk-img" style="float: right; margin-left: 0.5em;">
{{main page image|image=Acer diabolicum 9.JPG|caption=Female flowers with curled stigmas|width=120 <!-- Use 140 for square images and 160 for horizontal images-->}}<!--See [[Template:Main page image]] for other parameters-->
+
{{main page image|image=Acer diabolicum 9.JPG|caption=Female flowers with curled stigmas|width=120 }}
 
</div>
 
</div>
<!--
 
Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''''[[Acer diabolicum]]''''', the devil maple, gets its scientific and common names from its curly [[Stigma (botany)|stigmas]] ''(pictured)''?  <small>Source: "The scientific and common names arise from the curious hornlike stigmas which persist at the inner junction of the fruit nutlets, resembling the horns of the devil." [https://books.google.com/books?id=b5t0U5sVYOkC&pg=PA300&lpg=PA300&dq=Acer+diabolicum+stigma+horned&source=bl&ots=jkGU0XkX5e&sig=ACfU3U0i0gvxdrtDE5idoSPxEFsb--7ARA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxxonesKnmAhUPSa0KHR8MAzQQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=Acer%20diabolicum%20stigma%20horned&f=false Japanese Maples: The Complete Guide to Selection and Cultivation, Fourth Edition By Peter Gregory, J. D. Vertrees]</small>
 
* ... that '''''[[Acer diabolicum]]''''', the devil maple, gets its scientific and common names from its curly [[Stigma (botany)|stigmas]] ''(pictured)''?  <small>Source: "The scientific and common names arise from the curious hornlike stigmas which persist at the inner junction of the fruit nutlets, resembling the horns of the devil." [https://books.google.com/books?id=b5t0U5sVYOkC&pg=PA300&lpg=PA300&dq=Acer+diabolicum+stigma+horned&source=bl&ots=jkGU0XkX5e&sig=ACfU3U0i0gvxdrtDE5idoSPxEFsb--7ARA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjxxonesKnmAhUPSa0KHR8MAzQQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=Acer%20diabolicum%20stigma%20horned&f=false Japanese Maples: The Complete Guide to Selection and Cultivation, Fourth Edition By Peter Gregory, J. D. Vertrees]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that ...?
 
** '''ALT1''':... that ...?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[:Template:Did you know nominations/The Child (Star Wars character)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[:Template:Did you know nominations/The Child (Star Wars character)]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Abductive|Abductive]] ([[User talk:Abductive|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Abductive|Abductive]] ([[User talk:Abductive|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Acer diabolicum|Abductive|subpage=Acer diabolicum}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns.  The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns.  The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Line 31: Line 25:
 
:::::::::*{{ping|Abductive}} you just insert <nowiki><ref>Book or newspaper source information</ref></nowiki> at the end of the footnote and before the closing squiggly lines. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:::::::::*{{ping|Abductive}} you just insert <nowiki><ref>Book or newspaper source information</ref></nowiki> at the end of the footnote and before the closing squiggly lines. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::::::::::*I think I've completed the sourcing. I had to delete a footnote because I couldn't find the source I read back in December. I suspect that Google's algorithm was influenced by the creation of the Wikipedia article, since a number of my old search results are not reproducible. <span style="font-family: Cambria;">[[User:Abductive|<span style="color: teal;">'''Abductive'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abductive|reasoning]])</span> 05:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 
::::::::::*I think I've completed the sourcing. I had to delete a footnote because I couldn't find the source I read back in December. I suspect that Google's algorithm was influenced by the creation of the Wikipedia article, since a number of my old search results are not reproducible. <span style="font-family: Cambria;">[[User:Abductive|<span style="color: teal;">'''Abductive'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abductive|reasoning]])</span> 05:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
::::::::::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Thank you! Everything looks in order now. I am adding a freely-licensed image to the nomination, in case someone can do a close-up crop of the stigmas. I also tweaked the hook to put the bolded link first. Good to go per Dodger67's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 14:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
+
::::::::::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Thank you! Everything looks in order now. I am adding a freely-licensed image to the nomination, in case someone can do a close-up crop of the stigmas. I also tweaked the hook to put the bolded link first. Good to go per Dodger67's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 14:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 06:30, 3 February 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Acer diabolicum

Female flowers with curled stigmas
Female flowers with curled stigmas

Created by Abductive (talk). Self-nominated at 20:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Review: Article is 1. new enough, created 6 December. 2.It is long enough. 3. There are no serious policy concerns. The hook is 1 correctly formatted and 2 interesting enough. The images are all Commons compliant, of sufficient quality and one of them shows the feature mentioned in the hook. I support accepting this nomination. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Template:Ping did you pass this? If so, please add the appropriate tick. --evrik (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Done. Template:U apologies for the delay in tagging it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
      • Symbol voting keep.svg Repeating Roger (Dodger67)'s tick here, which was added after the "review again" icon; the bot that moves approved hooks only sees the lowest-appearing icon on the page, so duplicating the tick lower down will get this nomination to the Approved page. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but several paragraphs lack inline citations, per Rule D2. The footnotes are also uncited. Yoninah (talk) 20:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
  • I have been slowly adding citations. Let me know when I am done. Abductive (reasoning) 01:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Yoninah, it looks like all paragraphs have at least one inline citation. Is it ready? BlueMoonset (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I added a cn tag after a chunk of text under Cultivation and uses. The footnotes also need sources. Yoninah (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
  • I don't know how to put sources inside footnotes. Can you provide an example article that does it correctly? Or would a link to Wiktionary suffice for the word definitions? Abductive (reasoning) 22:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping you just insert <ref>Book or newspaper source information</ref> at the end of the footnote and before the closing squiggly lines. Yoninah (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
  • I think I've completed the sourcing. I had to delete a footnote because I couldn't find the source I read back in December. I suspect that Google's algorithm was influenced by the creation of the Wikipedia article, since a number of my old search results are not reproducible. Abductive (reasoning) 05:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol voting keep.svg Thank you! Everything looks in order now. I am adding a freely-licensed image to the nomination, in case someone can do a close-up crop of the stigmas. I also tweaked the hook to put the bolded link first. Good to go per Dodger67's review. Yoninah (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)