Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Achilles on Skyros"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 3) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace a deprecated template (*mp)) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[File:Poussin - 1656 - Achilles on Skyros.jpg|100x100px|Achilles on Skyros, 1656 painting by Nicolas Poussin, now in the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts]] | [[File:Poussin - 1656 - Achilles on Skyros.jpg|100x100px|Achilles on Skyros, 1656 painting by Nicolas Poussin, now in the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | *... that the [[Classical antiquity|Classical]] story of '''[[Achilles on Skyros]]''' was the basis for a lost play by [[Euripides]], a painting ''(pictured)'' by [[Nicolas Poussin]], and operas by [[Domenico Scarlatti]] and [[George Frideric Handel]]? | |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Cousins]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Cousins]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]). Self nom at 11:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]). Self nom at 11:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:33, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Achilles on Skyros
- ... that the Classical story of Achilles on Skyros was the basis for a lost play by Euripides, a painting (pictured) by Nicolas Poussin, and operas by Domenico Scarlatti and George Frideric Handel?
Created/expanded by Fram (talk). Self nom at 11:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting article. Decently written (I've made a few minor edits to clean up typos) and nicely illustrated. Sourcing is fine, and the length and date check out. The intro is a bit too brief though; it needs to be more comprehensive to meet the requirements of WP:LEAD. I'm happy to sign this off once that has been sorted out. Prioryman (talk) 21:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)