Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Adrian Poynings"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>NinaGreen
imported>Rosiestep
(HarvErrors script)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, date, hook's ref verified.  Very well referenced article; all non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No copyvio detected. QPQ done. Interesting hook; hook's length is fine. There are some harv errors, but that's not a reason to avoid approving this article. GTG. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 17:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, date, hook's ref verified.  Very well referenced article; all non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No copyvio detected. QPQ done. Interesting hook; hook's length is fine. There are some harv errors, but that's not a reason to avoid approving this article. GTG. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 17:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*Thanks for the review, and for pointing out the harv errors. I think I've fixed them all now. [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 18:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*Thanks for the review, and for pointing out the harv errors. I think I've fixed them all now. [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 18:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 
+
::::*Yes, they're all fixed now. Just as a friendly FYI (for you or someone else reading this), [[User:Ucucha/HarvErrors|this script]] is helpful. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 18:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:30, 21 September 2013

Adrian Poynings

Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 01:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Length, date, hook's ref verified. Very well referenced article; all non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No copyvio detected. QPQ done. Interesting hook; hook's length is fine. There are some harv errors, but that's not a reason to avoid approving this article. GTG. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review, and for pointing out the harv errors. I think I've fixed them all now. NinaGreen (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes, they're all fixed now. Just as a friendly FYI (for you or someone else reading this), this script is helpful. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)