Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Adrift (video game)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Fuebaey
(new review requested)
imported>Czar
(rev)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->
:* '''ALT1''':... that the upcoming video game '''''[[Adrift (video game)|Adrift]]''''' is a metaphor for the controversy caused by developer Adam Orth's comments on the [[Xbox One]] [[digital rights management]] scheme proposal?
+
:* '''ALT1''':... that the upcoming video game '''''[[Adrift (video game)|Adrift]]''''' is a metaphor for the controversy caused by developer Adam Orth's comments on the [[Xbox One]]'s proposed [[digital rights management]] strategy?
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hard Candy (film)|Hard Candy (film)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hard Candy (film)|Hard Candy (film)]]
 
:* ''Comment'': [http://threeonezero.com/developement-progress-puzzle-design-and-iteration/ Hook source], [http://www.polygon.com/2014/2/20/5427350/adam-orth-game-adrift ALT1 source]
 
:* ''Comment'': [http://threeonezero.com/developement-progress-puzzle-design-and-iteration/ Hook source], [http://www.polygon.com/2014/2/20/5427350/adam-orth-game-adrift ALT1 source]
Line 28: Line 28:
 
::::: I thought this was the case. Thanks for the information, {{u|czar}}! -- [[User:Rhain1999|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''1999</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Rhain1999|talk to me]])</sup> 08:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 
::::: I thought this was the case. Thanks for the information, {{u|czar}}! -- [[User:Rhain1999|<span style="color: #008;">'''''Rhain'''''1999</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Rhain1999|talk to me]])</sup> 08:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Original reviewer has not responded to this. New review requested. [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 22:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Original reviewer has not responded to this. New review requested. [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 22:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New (Dec 15th), long enough, neutral, a few close paraphrasing concerns [https://tools.wmflabs.org/dupdet/compare.php?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DAdrift_%28video_game%29%26oldid%3D640337491&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fkotaku.com%2Fadam-orth-is-turning-his-personal-disaster-into-a-beaut-1520037629&minwords=2&minchars=13&removequotations=1 here], [[Wikipedia:QPQ|QPQ]] done. First hook needs an immediate ref in article (see [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria|3b]]). Rephrased second hook to be a bit more neutral. Please ping me if I don't respond. <span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em "Avenir";color:#909'>czar</span>&nbsp;[[user:czar|<span style="color:black;font-size:1.2em"><u>⨹</u></span>]] 23:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:45, 10 January 2015

Adrift (video game)

  • ... that the original prototype for the upcoming video game Adrift was developed by three people in ten weeks?

Created by Rhain1999 (talk). Self nominated at 08:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The hook - while compelling - seems to be sourced to a self-published source, namely, the video game publisher's own website. Could the hook be changed to "that developers claimed the original ..."? Other than that it's new enough, long enough, well-sourced, and seems to meet all other criteria. DocumentError (talk) 01:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I have actually read some external sources that back up the statement in the hook, but I'm fine with changing the hook as you suggested. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 04:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Also, would it be possible to change the hook so that the title of the game reads "ADR1FT"? This is the official title for the game, and I actually believe that the article itself should be renamed if it does not conflict with any policies. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 01:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Ping, courtesy ping. Re: ADR1FT, the precedent of Se7en and Driv3r is to not spell it that way (with the sole exception of mentioning it once as a stylization in the lede). czar  04:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
I thought this was the case. Thanks for the information, Template:U! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 08:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Original reviewer has not responded to this. New review requested. Fuebaey (talk) 22:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg New (Dec 15th), long enough, neutral, a few close paraphrasing concerns here, QPQ done. First hook needs an immediate ref in article (see 3b). Rephrased second hook to be a bit more neutral. Please ping me if I don't respond. czar  23:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)