Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ai Tong School"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lionratz |
imported>MX (Good to go.) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
: Thanks for the review. I have addressed the first problem. As for your suggestion, I will get to that later.--[[User:Lionratz|Lionratz]] ([[User talk:Lionratz|talk]]) 03:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | : Thanks for the review. I have addressed the first problem. As for your suggestion, I will get to that later.--[[User:Lionratz|Lionratz]] ([[User talk:Lionratz|talk]]) 03:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Hook is sourced by two different sources. There is also no apparent close-paraphrasing, article was expanded 5x, and sources look good. The [http://www.edvantage.com.sg/edvantage/photos/1206380/P1_registration_11_of_Singapore_s_most_popular_primary.html first source] may look unreliable, but it was published by [[Singapore Press Holdings]]. The [http://www.ai-tong-alumni.org.sg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=4&lang=en second one] was from the school. As a future suggestion, if several consecutive sentences are using the same source, you are not required to add that source on each of the sentences. Cheers. [[User:ComputerJA|ComputerJA]] ([[User talk:ComputerJA|talk]]) 06:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 06:03, 28 January 2013
Ai Tong School
- ... that in 1979, only two students registered to join Ai Tong School, now one of the most popular schools in Singapore?
- Reviewed: 1978 Asian Games medal table
5x expanded by Lionratz (talk). Self nom at 05:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. In DYK nominations, every paragraph needs a citation, and the "Motto" and "Logo" paragraphs lack a source. In addition, just as a suggestion, it is not a requirement to add a citation for each sentence, and especially when the following one uses the same source. ComputerJA (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I have addressed the first problem. As for your suggestion, I will get to that later.--Lionratz (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hook is sourced by two different sources. There is also no apparent close-paraphrasing, article was expanded 5x, and sources look good. The first source may look unreliable, but it was published by Singapore Press Holdings. The second one was from the school. As a future suggestion, if several consecutive sentences are using the same source, you are not required to add that source on each of the sentences. Cheers. ComputerJA (talk) 06:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)