Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Aipysurus fuscus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Vanamonde93 (reply) |
imported>J Milburn (Good to go) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*A nice little article. New enough, long enough, citation checks out, good hook. Two recommendations. First, "It is found in Australia, Indonesia and East Timor" seems a little optimistic. Second, perhaps you could use a common name in the hook? I suspect, for readers, "rare coral snake" is more exciting than "rare thingy that could be a mould for all I know". [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC) | :*A nice little article. New enough, long enough, citation checks out, good hook. Two recommendations. First, "It is found in Australia, Indonesia and East Timor" seems a little optimistic. Second, perhaps you could use a common name in the hook? I suspect, for readers, "rare coral snake" is more exciting than "rare thingy that could be a mould for all I know". [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::*{{ping|J Milburn}} Both good points. I've changed the lead to read "in the Timor Sea, between Australia...". It turns out this is not actually a coral snake; that bit of text was in the article before, and somehow I did not spot it and correct it. It's a sea snake, from Hydrophiinae, which I've added to the hook. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC) | ::*{{ping|J Milburn}} Both good points. I've changed the lead to read "in the Timor Sea, between Australia...". It turns out this is not actually a coral snake; that bit of text was in the article before, and somehow I did not spot it and correct it. It's a sea snake, from Hydrophiinae, which I've added to the hook. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Great stuff; good to go. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 15:10, 22 April 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aipysurus fuscus
- ... that the population of the endangered sea snake Aipysurus fuscus is thought to have declined at least 70% between 1998 and 2013? "Aipysurus fuscus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. 2010. 2009. Retrieved 20 December 2016.
- Reviewed: Nellie Griswold Francis
5x expanded by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC).
- A nice little article. New enough, long enough, citation checks out, good hook. Two recommendations. First, "It is found in Australia, Indonesia and East Timor" seems a little optimistic. Second, perhaps you could use a common name in the hook? I suspect, for readers, "rare coral snake" is more exciting than "rare thingy that could be a mould for all I know". Josh Milburn (talk) 21:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Both good points. I've changed the lead to read "in the Timor Sea, between Australia...". It turns out this is not actually a coral snake; that bit of text was in the article before, and somehow I did not spot it and correct it. It's a sea snake, from Hydrophiinae, which I've added to the hook. Vanamonde (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Great stuff; good to go. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)