Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Aipysurus fuscus"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J Milburn
(Good to go)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=April 2017  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Aipysurus fuscus====
 
====Aipysurus fuscus====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Aipysurus fuscus|Aipysurus fuscus}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Aipysurus fuscus|Aipysurus fuscus}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the population of the endangered [[Hydrophiinae|sea snake]] '''''[[Aipysurus fuscus]]''''' is thought to have declined at least 70% between 1998 and 2013?  <small>{{cite journal | title = ''Aipysurus fuscus'' | journal = [[IUCN Red List of Threatened Species]] | volume= 2010 | publisher = [[IUCN]] | year = 2009 | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/176763/0 | accessdate = 20 December 2016}}</small>
 
* ... that the population of the endangered [[Hydrophiinae|sea snake]] '''''[[Aipysurus fuscus]]''''' is thought to have declined at least 70% between 1998 and 2013?  <small>{{cite journal | title = ''Aipysurus fuscus'' | journal = [[IUCN Red List of Threatened Species]] | volume= 2010 | publisher = [[IUCN]] | year = 2009 | url = http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/176763/0 | accessdate = 20 December 2016}}</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nellie Griswold Francis|Nellie Griswold Francis]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nellie Griswold Francis|Nellie Griswold Francis]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Aipysurus fuscus|Vanamonde93|subpage=Aipysurus fuscus}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*A nice little article. New enough, long enough, citation checks out, good hook. Two recommendations. First, "It is found in Australia, Indonesia and East Timor" seems a little optimistic. Second, perhaps you could use a common name in the hook? I suspect, for readers, "rare coral snake" is more exciting than "rare thingy that could be a mould for all I know". [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 
:*A nice little article. New enough, long enough, citation checks out, good hook. Two recommendations. First, "It is found in Australia, Indonesia and East Timor" seems a little optimistic. Second, perhaps you could use a common name in the hook? I suspect, for readers, "rare coral snake" is more exciting than "rare thingy that could be a mould for all I know". [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 21:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|J Milburn}} Both good points. I've changed the lead to read "in the Timor Sea, between Australia...". It turns out this is not actually a coral snake; that bit of text was in the article before, and somehow I did not spot it and correct it. It's a sea snake, from Hydrophiinae, which I've added to the hook. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|J Milburn}} Both good points. I've changed the lead to read "in the Timor Sea, between Australia...". It turns out this is not actually a coral snake; that bit of text was in the article before, and somehow I did not spot it and correct it. It's a sea snake, from Hydrophiinae, which I've added to the hook. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Great stuff; good to go. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
+
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Great stuff; good to go. [[User:J Milburn|Josh Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 09:19, 1 May 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Aipysurus fuscus

  • ... that the population of the endangered sea snake Aipysurus fuscus is thought to have declined at least 70% between 1998 and 2013? "Aipysurus fuscus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. 2010. 2009. Retrieved 20 December 2016.

5x expanded by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC).

  • A nice little article. New enough, long enough, citation checks out, good hook. Two recommendations. First, "It is found in Australia, Indonesia and East Timor" seems a little optimistic. Second, perhaps you could use a common name in the hook? I suspect, for readers, "rare coral snake" is more exciting than "rare thingy that could be a mould for all I know". Josh Milburn (talk) 21:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Both good points. I've changed the lead to read "in the Timor Sea, between Australia...". It turns out this is not actually a coral snake; that bit of text was in the article before, and somehow I did not spot it and correct it. It's a sea snake, from Hydrophiinae, which I've added to the hook. Vanamonde (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)