Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Alice Vickery"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Antidiskriminator
(re)
imported>Antidiskriminator
(cmt)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
:* The article is new and long enough.<s>I used [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rpharms.com%2Fwomen-pharmacists-before-the-20th-century%2Falice-vickery.asp&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAlice_Vickery&minwords=2&minchars=13 duplication detector] and found one sentence with 10 words matched phrase while rest of the sentence might be too close paraphrasing. I would take care about it myself, but because of my language skills I hope nominator would not mind resolving this minor issue.</s> The hook is hooky, properly formatted and not too long (189 characters).--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 21:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:* The article is new and long enough.<s>I used [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rpharms.com%2Fwomen-pharmacists-before-the-20th-century%2Falice-vickery.asp&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAlice_Vickery&minwords=2&minchars=13 duplication detector] and found one sentence with 10 words matched phrase while rest of the sentence might be too close paraphrasing. I would take care about it myself, but because of my language skills I hope nominator would not mind resolving this minor issue.</s> The hook is hooky, properly formatted and not too long (189 characters).--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 21:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:::Thanks for choosing this nomination. I've rephrased the 10-word sentence. Other matches are that of very long names of organisations and political parties, which obviously cannot be reworded. Is it all sorted out now? [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 22:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:::Thanks for choosing this nomination. I've rephrased the 10-word sentence. Other matches are that of very long names of organisations and political parties, which obviously cannot be reworded. Is it all sorted out now? [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 22:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
::::Thank you for very interesting article (and not the only one you wrote). I noticed long names of organizations so I did not mention them as an issue. Thank you for resolving this minor one. I will now continue with the review.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 22:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
+
::::Thank you for very interesting article (and not the only one you wrote). I noticed long names of organizations so I did not mention them as an issue. Thank you for resolving this minor one. I will now continue with the review. The hook assertion about marriage being legal prostitution is not cited. Is it cited with reference at the end of paragraph?--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 22:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:47, 28 July 2013

Alice Vickery

Alice Vickery

  • Comment: The image would greatly improve the quality of the hook because Vickery looks like a typical Victorian prude, someone we would not expect to be an anti-marriage activist.

Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self nominated at 23:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC).

  • The article is new and long enough.I used duplication detector and found one sentence with 10 words matched phrase while rest of the sentence might be too close paraphrasing. I would take care about it myself, but because of my language skills I hope nominator would not mind resolving this minor issue. The hook is hooky, properly formatted and not too long (189 characters).--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for choosing this nomination. I've rephrased the 10-word sentence. Other matches are that of very long names of organisations and political parties, which obviously cannot be reworded. Is it all sorted out now? Surtsicna (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for very interesting article (and not the only one you wrote). I noticed long names of organizations so I did not mention them as an issue. Thank you for resolving this minor one. I will now continue with the review. The hook assertion about marriage being legal prostitution is not cited. Is it cited with reference at the end of paragraph?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)