Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Allen Shoup"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Zanhe (found it) |
imported>Donnie Park |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
:::::* {{re|Donnie Park}} There was a recent discussion on [[WT:DYK]] about whether a QPQ for a failed nomination could be reused, and I think most people answered yes. Search the archives for details. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 20:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | :::::* {{re|Donnie Park}} There was a recent discussion on [[WT:DYK]] about whether a QPQ for a failed nomination could be reused, and I think most people answered yes. Search the archives for details. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 20:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::: Found the link: [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 119#Is it allowed to reuse reviews for QPQs if a nomination has been (correctly) rejected?]]. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 20:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | ::::::: Found the link: [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 119#Is it allowed to reuse reviews for QPQs if a nomination has been (correctly) rejected?]]. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 20:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ::::::::*{{re|Zanhe}} Thanks but the next part is, can I continue to review articles to build up QPQ for future articles considering I have over 20/30 planned this year? Thanks in advance. [[User:Donnie Park|Donnie Park]] ([[User talk:Donnie Park|talk]]) 22:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 22:22, 30 January 2016
DYK toolbox |
---|
Allen Shoup
- ... that Allen Shoup (pictured) is recognized as the "strategist behind the great growth of Chateau Ste. Michelle through the 1980s and 1990s ....?
- ALT1:... that under Allen Shoup’s (pictured) leadership, Stimson Lane "grew from a prominent local winery to one of the top 10 premium wines in the nation" ....?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Een Bloemhof
Created by Bellevuewinegal (talk). Nominated by Donnie Park (talk) at 02:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Since the article creator is nowhere to be seen for a week, I've requested the article to be copyedited, so until then let's see how this goes. Donnie Park (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Template:U, I think it needs to be completely rewritten, not copyedited; but as you say, let's see how it goes. I'm sorry that this has not gone well for you. I simply can't understand why we allow COI editing in draft space – this sort of thing is the inevitable result. Taking a cynical view, is it surprising that the article creator is not around? She's done her job, perhaps collected a fee for it, moved on to the next thing. In case you hadn't noticed: Bellevue, Washington is where Shoup is from. I'm still completely willing to to look at this again if we have an acceptably neutral article and a different hook. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Agree with Template:U. This article suffers from serious COI, promotional language, and notability issues. The AfC was rejected by the first reviewer, whose decision was probably correct. -Zanhe (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Template:UTemplate:U The next question is how was this allowed to pass WP:AfC, when the same group declined Draft:Nic Case? Because of this nomination, I feel I made a fool out of myself. Also since I want to retract the nomination, can I use the review to be redeemed for a future nomination since I have some more articles to nominate this year. Donnie Park (talk) 16:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Template:U, I said above and will repeat here: I believe that your nomination was made entirely in good faith. If it has turned out to have been a not-so-great idea, that doesn't make a fool of you. We all make mistakes, and perhaps can learn from them. I also believe that the article was created in good faith; I don't personally think it should have been accepted, but I don't see any value in going over that ground now. I'm afraid I don't know if you can recycle your QPQ, I hope that some more experienced reviewer will answer that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Re There was a recent discussion on WT:DYK about whether a QPQ for a failed nomination could be reused, and I think most people answered yes. Search the archives for details. -Zanhe (talk) 20:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Found the link: Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 119#Is it allowed to reuse reviews for QPQs if a nomination has been (correctly) rejected?. -Zanhe (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Re Thanks but the next part is, can I continue to review articles to build up QPQ for future articles considering I have over 20/30 planned this year? Thanks in advance. Donnie Park (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Found the link: Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Archive 119#Is it allowed to reuse reviews for QPQs if a nomination has been (correctly) rejected?. -Zanhe (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)