Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ammophila urnaria"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>West Virginian
m (Tick!)
imported>PFHLai
(to P1)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 05:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Ammophila urnaria====
 
====Ammophila urnaria====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Ammophila urnaria|Ammophila urnaria}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Ammophila urnaria|Ammophila urnaria}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the wasp '''''[[Ammophila urnaria]]''''' uses a [[tool]] to help conceal its [[Nest#Insects|nest]]?
 
* ... that the wasp '''''[[Ammophila urnaria]]''''' uses a [[tool]] to help conceal its [[Nest#Insects|nest]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/All Saints Church, Odiham|All Saints Church, Odiham]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/All Saints Church, Odiham|All Saints Church, Odiham]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 11:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 11:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Ammophila urnaria|Cwmhiraeth}}
 
-->
 
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This is a very interesting and catchy hook indeed. The article is new enough and long enough, and the article utilizes appropriate sources, which are internally cited throughout the text. A QPQ review has also been completed. -- [[User:Caponer|Caponer]] ([[User talk:Caponer|talk]]) 02:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This is a very interesting and catchy hook indeed. The article is new enough and long enough, and the article utilizes appropriate sources, which are internally cited throughout the text. A QPQ review has also been completed. -- [[User:Caponer|Caponer]] ([[User talk:Caponer|talk]]) 02:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 05:50, 21 November 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 05:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Ammophila urnaria

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 11:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px This is a very interesting and catchy hook indeed. The article is new enough and long enough, and the article utilizes appropriate sources, which are internally cited throughout the text. A QPQ review has also been completed. -- Caponer (talk) 02:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)