Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Amorebieta-Etxano"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Oceanh (ticked "?") |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (ALT1 suggested) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] · Article size and expansion is fine, and the article is appropriately referenced. Hook is neutral and interesting enough. The merge in 1951 has inline citation, and is verified in online reference. The "two very unequal-sized communities" part of the hook seems unclear to me. "Size" is ambigious (area or population?), and while the area of Amorebieta and Etxano is not mentioned at all, the difference in population seems to be based on the 2014 census (which is cited, but the linked url returned only emptiness), not at the time of the merge. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) 12:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] · Article size and expansion is fine, and the article is appropriately referenced. Hook is neutral and interesting enough. The merge in 1951 has inline citation, and is verified in online reference. The "two very unequal-sized communities" part of the hook seems unclear to me. "Size" is ambigious (area or population?), and while the area of Amorebieta and Etxano is not mentioned at all, the difference in population seems to be based on the 2014 census (which is cited, but the linked url returned only emptiness), not at the time of the merge. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) 12:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::{{reply to|Oceanh}} The figures can be got from the INE database (ref 4) by putting the required location into the search box. The 2014 figures are way over to the right on my screen. The hook is not very exciting, but I guess the town is largely a dormitory town for Bilbao. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 12:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | *'''ALT1''' ... that the municipality of '''[[Amorebieta-Etxano]]''' was formed in 1951 by the merger of two communities, one of which had nearly 17,000 inhabitants by 2014 while the other had just 221? | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:58, 23 October 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Amorebieta-Etxano
- ... that the municipality of Amorebieta-Etxano was formed in 1951 by the merger of two very unequal-sized communities?
- Reviewed: Rosamind Julius
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC).
· Article size and expansion is fine, and the article is appropriately referenced. Hook is neutral and interesting enough. The merge in 1951 has inline citation, and is verified in online reference. The "two very unequal-sized communities" part of the hook seems unclear to me. "Size" is ambigious (area or population?), and while the area of Amorebieta and Etxano is not mentioned at all, the difference in population seems to be based on the 2014 census (which is cited, but the linked url returned only emptiness), not at the time of the merge. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. Oceanh (talk) 12:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to The figures can be got from the INE database (ref 4) by putting the required location into the search box. The 2014 figures are way over to the right on my screen. The hook is not very exciting, but I guess the town is largely a dormitory town for Bilbao. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the municipality of Amorebieta-Etxano was formed in 1951 by the merger of two communities, one of which had nearly 17,000 inhabitants by 2014 while the other had just 221?