Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Amy Wax"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(add; npov) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Comment. There was an earlier (first paragraphs nearly identical, except for some deletions by the nom in this second one) version of this page at AFC by an editor other than the nom here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Amy_Wax&action=edit&redlink=1 In some ways that earlier version was better -- it had footnotes for every assertion in the first few paragraphs, while in this version nom took them out. This version also needs grammar cleanup - "the" and "a" and similar words were dropped from the first version, where needed. Also, some facts, like that the subject attended Harvard Law School, were deleted for some reason. I think if the first version is made viewable and this one is improved along these lines this will be better for approval for this category. Also, when in this version nom writes "Amy Wax has been called "notorious..", maybe it would be an improvement to say by whom. [[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC|2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC|talk]]) 17:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC) | + | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Comment. There was an earlier (first paragraphs nearly identical, except for some deletions by the nom in this second one) version of this page at AFC by an editor other than the nom here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Amy_Wax&action=edit&redlink=1 In some ways that earlier version was better -- it had footnotes for every assertion in the first few paragraphs, while in this version nom took them out. This version also needs grammar cleanup - "the" and "a" and similar words were dropped from the first version, where needed. Also, some facts, like that the subject attended Harvard Law School, were deleted for some reason. I think if the first version is made viewable and this one is improved along these lines this will be better for approval for this category. Also, when in this version nom writes "Amy Wax has been called "notorious..", maybe it would be an improvement to say by whom. Also, it may be a good idea to have the controversy paragraph, which presents only one side, instead comply with [[wp:npov]] (representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic; switching out "claimed" for "said").[[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC|2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC|talk]]) 17:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 04:18, 9 April 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
Amy Wax
- ... that controversial American lawyer Amy Wax who argued 15 cases in the US Supreme Court, first graduated from Harvard Medical School?
- ALT1:... that controversial American academic Amy Wax graduated from Harvard Medical School before becoming a lawyer?
Created by Mhym (talk). Self-nominated at 02:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC).
Comment. There was an earlier (first paragraphs nearly identical, except for some deletions by the nom in this second one) version of this page at AFC by an editor other than the nom here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Amy_Wax&action=edit&redlink=1 In some ways that earlier version was better -- it had footnotes for every assertion in the first few paragraphs, while in this version nom took them out. This version also needs grammar cleanup - "the" and "a" and similar words were dropped from the first version, where needed. Also, some facts, like that the subject attended Harvard Law School, were deleted for some reason. I think if the first version is made viewable and this one is improved along these lines this will be better for approval for this category. Also, when in this version nom writes "Amy Wax has been called "notorious..", maybe it would be an improvement to say by whom. Also, it may be a good idea to have the controversy paragraph, which presents only one side, instead comply with wp:npov (representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic; switching out "claimed" for "said").2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)