Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Angie Epifano"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
(striking old hook - to avoid risk of wrong one getting promoted)
imported>Sven Manguard
(moved to prep 4 using Alt 1)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=April 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004"><big>'''S</big>ven&nbsp;<big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 04:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Angie Epifano====
 
====Angie Epifano====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Angie Epifano|Angie Epifano}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Angie Epifano|Angie Epifano}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... <s>that '''[[Angie Epifano]]''' gained national and international attention after she wrote an essay on her personal experience with [[sexual assault]]?</s>
 
* ... <s>that '''[[Angie Epifano]]''' gained national and international attention after she wrote an essay on her personal experience with [[sexual assault]]?</s>
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Newport Creek|Newport Creek]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Newport Creek|Newport Creek]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:I am One of Many|I am One of Many]] ([[User talk:I am One of Many|talk]]). Self nominated at 06:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:I am One of Many|I am One of Many]] ([[User talk:I am One of Many|talk]]). Self nominated at 06:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Angie Epifano|I am One of Many}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, good citations, no copyvio/close paraphrasing found when comparing with the sources. But, the "international" attention seems to be just one article on an Australian website that appears to be a republication from Slate (a US site). I'd like to see more than that to merit "and international". [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 21:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, good citations, no copyvio/close paraphrasing found when comparing with the sources. But, the "international" attention seems to be just one article on an Australian website that appears to be a republication from Slate (a US site). I'd like to see more than that to merit "and international". [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 21:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 18:
  
 
:::::[[User:I am One of Many|I am One of Many]] ([[User talk:I am One of Many|talk]]) 16:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 
:::::[[User:I am One of Many|I am One of Many]] ([[User talk:I am One of Many|talk]]) 16:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
::::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I'm happy to sign off on '''ALT1'''. Made one small tweak, I think "of" sounds better/clearer than "with". [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 20:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
+
::::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I'm happy to sign off on '''ALT1'''. Made one small tweak, I think "of" sounds better/clearer than "with". [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 20:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 04:17, 11 April 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 04:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Angie Epifano

  • ... that Angie Epifano gained national and international attention after she wrote an essay on her personal experience with sexual assault?

Created by I am One of Many (talk). Self nominated at 06:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, good citations, no copyvio/close paraphrasing found when comparing with the sources. But, the "international" attention seems to be just one article on an Australian website that appears to be a republication from Slate (a US site). I'd like to see more than that to merit "and international". Edwardx (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  • First, thank you for reviewing the article. I don't see the similarity between the Australian website article and the Slate article. They are by two different authors and they diverge in content. That being said, one article seems scant evidence for international attention. The USA Today article states that the essay has received millions of international page views. I added that. Do you think it is enough or would you like me to propose an alternative hook? I am One of Many (talk) 23:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
  • The Slate article in your references is a different one. The Beverly Donofrio Slate article that is republished on the Australian site is [[1]]. As for "the millions of international page views", we should bear in mind that the concept "international" subsumes "national", and that the vast majority of those international hits could be American. US Today is perhaps not the most rigorous of publications. As you suggest, "international attention" suggests media attention rather than just hits. I would think that some sort of phrasing along the lines of "gained widespread media attention and millions of page views" could avoid the whole national/international issue and still be as punchy. Edwardx (talk) 10:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Good catch! I culled the Slate article out of my reading list early on partly because I already had a Slate article and it was only motivated by Annie Epifano's case. Then when I got down to reading all the articles, I failed to notice that it was reprinted at the Australian website. We want the hook to be punchy but in the best taste we can for this subject, so I like your idea. I'll change the article, based on the sources, to fit this alternative hook.
Alt1: ... that Angie Epifano gained widespread media attention and millions of page views after she wrote an essay on her personal experience of sexual assault?
I am One of Many (talk) 16:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg I'm happy to sign off on ALT1. Made one small tweak, I think "of" sounds better/clearer than "with". Edwardx (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)