Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Landouw"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492
(re)
imported>Titodutta
(re)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
::* Those URAA, EU anonymous etc templates are not applicable for the derivative work, since you cropped (created) it yesterday. I have [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AAnnie_Landouw_crop.jpg&diff=98692199&oldid=98640168 made some changes]. You can revert it and discuss here. (PS. for some reason, I am not being notified, but, I am following watchlist) --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 03:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 
::* Those URAA, EU anonymous etc templates are not applicable for the derivative work, since you cropped (created) it yesterday. I have [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AAnnie_Landouw_crop.jpg&diff=98692199&oldid=98640168 made some changes]. You can revert it and discuss here. (PS. for some reason, I am not being notified, but, I am following watchlist) --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 03:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*Nobody has claimed as much in my FACs before, although in theory it has merit. Your changes look fine.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 03:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*Nobody has claimed as much in my FACs before, although in theory it has merit. Your changes look fine.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 03:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 
+
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay, good to go. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 03:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 03:32, 23 June 2013

Annie Landouw

Annie Landouw

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nominated at 06:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC).

  • Doing... --TitoDutta 22:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  • 1) Not very interesting hook unless told which character 2) Image licensing issue, uploader does not seem to be copyright holder. --TitoDutta 22:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Titodutta, have you looked at the part where it says this is a derivative work? I am, technically, the copyright holder on the derivative work of the public domain image (linked as the source). I don't claim copyright on it, because I don't feel I should, but there are some who will reimagine PD images and claim copyright. How is the name of the character more interesting? We could add "main" before character, but 99% of our readers will not know who Yah is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Date, length, copyvio checked. If you crop a public domain image and claim copyright, then "Licensing" is incorrect where license details of the original image has been given, but, there is nothing about the derivative work. --TitoDutta 03:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
    • No, it says "I release this under the following license", which means I am putting my derivative work in the public domain as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Those URAA, EU anonymous etc templates are not applicable for the derivative work, since you cropped (created) it yesterday. I have made some changes. You can revert it and discuss here. (PS. for some reason, I am not being notified, but, I am following watchlist) --TitoDutta 03:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Nobody has claimed as much in my FACs before, although in theory it has merit. Your changes look fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Okay, good to go. --TitoDutta 03:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)