Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anthony Chen"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Violetriga
(Too short for me...)
imported>Bonkers The Clown
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I calculate the article to be only 1507 characters which is very close to the bottom end cut-off. Given that it is so short and there is some level of repetition between the lead and the main text I'm finding it difficult to pass. Furthermore, there are some poorly written sections ("Interested in film since a tender age", "which was called", ...) and removing this flowery language would take it below 1500 characters. Is there any scope for an expansion? Otherwise it meets the criteria. [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]]&nbsp;<sub><sup>[[user talk:violetriga|[talk]]]</sup></sub> 19:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I calculate the article to be only 1507 characters which is very close to the bottom end cut-off. Given that it is so short and there is some level of repetition between the lead and the main text I'm finding it difficult to pass. Furthermore, there are some poorly written sections ("Interested in film since a tender age", "which was called", ...) and removing this flowery language would take it below 1500 characters. Is there any scope for an expansion? Otherwise it meets the criteria. [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]]&nbsp;<sub><sup>[[user talk:violetriga|[talk]]]</sup></sub> 19:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 +
::Beefed up. ☯ [[User:Bonkers The Clown|<font color = "Jade" face="Arial">'''Bonkers''' ''The Clown''</font>]] '''\(^_^)/''' '''[[User talk:Bonkers The Clown| Nonsensical Babble]]'''  ☯ 08:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 08:59, 13 August 2013

Anthony Chen

5x expanded by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 09:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg I calculate the article to be only 1507 characters which is very close to the bottom end cut-off. Given that it is so short and there is some level of repetition between the lead and the main text I'm finding it difficult to pass. Furthermore, there are some poorly written sections ("Interested in film since a tender age", "which was called", ...) and removing this flowery language would take it below 1500 characters. Is there any scope for an expansion? Otherwise it meets the criteria. violet/riga [talk] 19:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Beefed up. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)