Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anthony Chen"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bonkers The Clown |
imported>Violetriga (:::{{subst:DYKtick}} I'm now happy with article and it's ready to go. ~~~~) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* I calculate the article to be only 1507 characters which is very close to the bottom end cut-off. Given that it is so short and there is some level of repetition between the lead and the main text I'm finding it difficult to pass. Furthermore, there are some poorly written sections ("Interested in film since a tender age", "which was called", ...) and removing this flowery language would take it below 1500 characters. Is there any scope for an expansion? Otherwise it meets the criteria. [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]] <sub><sup>[[user talk:violetriga|[talk]]]</sup></sub> 19:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
::Beefed up. ☯ [[User:Bonkers The Clown|<font color = "Jade" face="Arial">'''Bonkers''' ''The Clown''</font>]] '''\(^_^)/''' '''[[User talk:Bonkers The Clown| Nonsensical Babble]]''' ☯ 08:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC) | ::Beefed up. ☯ [[User:Bonkers The Clown|<font color = "Jade" face="Arial">'''Bonkers''' ''The Clown''</font>]] '''\(^_^)/''' '''[[User talk:Bonkers The Clown| Nonsensical Babble]]''' ☯ 08:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I'm now happy with article and it's ready to go. [[user:violetriga|violet/riga]] <sub><sup>[[user talk:violetriga|[talk]]]</sup></sub> 16:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 16:49, 13 August 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Anthony Chen
- ... that Singaporean film director Anthony ChenTemplate:`s Ilo Ilo (2013) earned him the Camera d'Or at the 2013 Cannes Film Festival?
5x expanded by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 09:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC).
- I calculate the article to be only 1507 characters which is very close to the bottom end cut-off. Given that it is so short and there is some level of repetition between the lead and the main text I'm finding it difficult to pass. Furthermore, there are some poorly written sections ("Interested in film since a tender age", "which was called", ...) and removing this flowery language would take it below 1500 characters. Is there any scope for an expansion? Otherwise it meets the criteria. violet/riga [talk] 19:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- Beefed up. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm now happy with article and it's ready to go. violet/riga [talk] 16:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)