Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anthony Lee"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>NinaGreen
imported>Rcsprinter123
(Approved, moved to prep2)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]] </font><font color="#151B8D"> ''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:#488AC7">(message)</span>]]</font> <small>@</small> 22:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Anthony Lee====
 
====Anthony Lee====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Anthony Lee|Anthony Lee}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Anthony Lee|Anthony Lee}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the favours done by '''[[Anthony Lee|Sir Anthony Lee]]''' for the poet [[Thomas Wyatt (poet)|Thomas Wyatt]] were so infinite that it made Wyatt "weary to think on them"?
 
* ... that the favours done by '''[[Anthony Lee|Sir Anthony Lee]]''' for the poet [[Thomas Wyatt (poet)|Thomas Wyatt]] were so infinite that it made Wyatt "weary to think on them"?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rainthorpe Hall|Rainthorpe Hall]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rainthorpe Hall|Rainthorpe Hall]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 05:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 05:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Anthony Lee|NinaGreen}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I think the hook sounds a little off. Shouldn't it be "were so many" or "were so much"? I'll continue with the rest of the review once we come to an understanding. Thanks! [[User:Proudbolsahye|Proudbolsahye]] ([[User talk:Proudbolsahye|talk]]) 06:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I think the hook sounds a little off. Shouldn't it be "were so many" or "were so much"? I'll continue with the rest of the review once we come to an understanding. Thanks! [[User:Proudbolsahye|Proudbolsahye]] ([[User talk:Proudbolsahye|talk]]) 06:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Line 26: Line 16:
 
::::'''ALT1''' ... that the favours done by '''[[Anthony Lee|Sir Anthony Lee]]''' for the poet [[Thomas Wyatt (poet)|Thomas Wyatt]] were so many that it made Wyatt "weary to think on them"?
 
::::'''ALT1''' ... that the favours done by '''[[Anthony Lee|Sir Anthony Lee]]''' for the poet [[Thomas Wyatt (poet)|Thomas Wyatt]] were so many that it made Wyatt "weary to think on them"?
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sources are reliable. New enough. Long enough. ALT1 is preferable. The article was a great and smooth read. I would reccomend this for GA. The lead needs to be expanded a bit though. Anyways, GTG!!!
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sources are reliable. New enough. Long enough. ALT1 is preferable. The article was a great and smooth read. I would reccomend this for GA. The lead needs to be expanded a bit though. Anyways, GTG!!!
::::::Thanks for the review! I've added to the lead as per your recommendation. [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 22:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
+
::::::Thanks for the review! I've added to the lead as per your recommendation. [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 22:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 22:40, 5 December 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (message) @ 22:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Anthony Lee

Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 05:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px I think the hook sounds a little off. Shouldn't it be "were so many" or "were so much"? I'll continue with the rest of the review once we come to an understanding. Thanks! Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • The source has this wording:Before 1540 Lee appears to have befriended his brother-in-law Wyatt in various ways, not only by lending him money but also, in Wyatt’s words, by ‘other infinite [?ways] that makes me weary to think on them’. NinaGreen (talk) 15:39, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Personally, I think the source has a touch of poetic language that doesn't appear to be suitable for an encyclopedia. If we change it to "so many" perhaps that would be more encyclopedic. After all, were not suppose to jot down the wording of the source word by word. What do you think? Proudbolsahye (talk) 23:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Sure, 'so many' sounds fine. NinaGreen (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
ALT1 ... that the favours done by Sir Anthony Lee for the poet Thomas Wyatt were so many that it made Wyatt "weary to think on them"?

16px Sources are reliable. New enough. Long enough. ALT1 is preferable. The article was a great and smooth read. I would reccomend this for GA. The lead needs to be expanded a bit though. Anyways, GTG!!!

Thanks for the review! I've added to the lead as per your recommendation. NinaGreen (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)