Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Muslim pogroms in India"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dharmadhyaksha |
imported>Titodutta (re) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
**[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Has a neutrality tag. — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC) | **[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Has a neutrality tag. — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | * {{ec}} {{grey|double edit conflict}} Whoosh! Was going to say exactly the same thing— the article has maintenance tags which need to be solved! --[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Titodutta|contributions]] • [[Special:EmailUser/Titodutta|email]]) 14:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 6 June 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Anti-Muslim pogroms in India
- ... that anti-Muslim pogroms in India have been described by Gyanendra Pandey as a new form of state terrorism?
- Reviewed: If you reviewed another article before listing this DYK nomination, put it here. Otherwise leave this line alone; it will blank when saved.
- ALT1 ... that since 1950 anti-Muslim pogroms in India have resulted in an estimated 10000 people being killed?
Created/expanded by Darkness Shines (talk). Self nominated at 16:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC).
Long enough, new, expanded. Has neutral point of view. I think it should go ahead. Faizan 04:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Interesting to know that you specifically pointed out "Has neutral point of view" when you were quite aware of all the NPOV issues with this article that were being discussed at various venues. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Has a neutrality tag. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) double edit conflict Whoosh! Was going to say exactly the same thing— the article has maintenance tags which need to be solved! --Tito Dutta (talk • contributions • email) 14:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)