Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Terror Units"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>7&6=thirteen (Full review needed and to be completed.) |
imported>7&6=thirteen (23W Full review needed. If you are now satisfied this needs a tick.) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] (In the article) "YAT members were simply the most brave and devoted fighters", "but not true special or elite forces". "Brave", "devoted", "true"—these labels need attribution. I would rephrase the sentence as follows: "Initially, YAT members were '''chosen by the YPG and YPJ as simply''' the most brave and devoted fighters '''within those units''', but not '''as''' true special or elite forces." Aside from this non-neutral bit, the article meets length and newness requirements and is very interesting. Nice work. [[User:23W|23W]] 00:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] (In the article) "YAT members were simply the most brave and devoted fighters", "but not true special or elite forces". "Brave", "devoted", "true"—these labels need attribution. I would rephrase the sentence as follows: "Initially, YAT members were '''chosen by the YPG and YPJ as simply''' the most brave and devoted fighters '''within those units''', but not '''as''' true special or elite forces." Aside from this non-neutral bit, the article meets length and newness requirements and is very interesting. Nice work. [[User:23W|23W]] 00:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
:** Thank you for the review and the suggestion. I have changed the sentence accordingly; now it is much better. [[User:Applodion|Applodion]] ([[User talk:Applodion|talk]]) 10:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | :** Thank you for the review and the suggestion. I have changed the sentence accordingly; now it is much better. [[User:Applodion|Applodion]] ([[User talk:Applodion|talk]]) 10:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Full review needed. | + | ::[[User:23W|23W]] Full review needed. If you are now satisfied this needs a tick. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 11:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 11:13, 3 June 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Anti-Terror Units
- ... that the leader of the United States-trained Anti-Terror Units was suspected to have been assassinated by Turkish Intelligence operatives for conducting "terror operations"? Source: "Less than a day after the IED explosion, Turkey’s Anadolu News trumpeted the assassination, saying that Ali Boutan, also known Haji Kurkhan, was the 'leader of the YPG special forces.' 'Boutan was responsible for sending [PKK] fighters to Turkey to conduct terror operations,' the report further claimed." ([1]); "[YAT] members were able to receive direct US Army Special Forces training. Ranking unit members were sent to the US to go through intense training at Ft. Bragg and Ft. Campbell, in addition to regional training at a special compound outside of Amman, Jordan, and in Kurdistan, under the guidance of the Central Intelligence Agency. In late 2016, Boutan was targeted and killed by what is believed to have been Turkish Intelligence operatives as he was traveling through Syria as part of the YPG Special Forces command" ([2])
- Reviewed: Battle of Gegodog
Created by Applodion (talk). Self-nominated at 21:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC).
(In the article) "YAT members were simply the most brave and devoted fighters", "but not true special or elite forces". "Brave", "devoted", "true"—these labels need attribution. I would rephrase the sentence as follows: "Initially, YAT members were chosen by the YPG and YPJ as simply the most brave and devoted fighters within those units, but not as true special or elite forces." Aside from this non-neutral bit, the article meets length and newness requirements and is very interesting. Nice work. 23W 00:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- 23W Full review needed. If you are now satisfied this needs a tick. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
