Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Antonín Cyril Stojan"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(restoring tick)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from February 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=February 2017  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Antonín Cyril Stojan====
 
====Antonín Cyril Stojan====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Antonín Cyril Stojan|Antonín Cyril Stojan}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Antonín Cyril Stojan|Antonín Cyril Stojan}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* <s>... that '''[[Antonín Cyril Stojan]]''' was titled as [[Venerable]] by [[Pope Francis]]?</s>
 
* <s>... that '''[[Antonín Cyril Stojan]]''' was titled as [[Venerable]] by [[Pope Francis]]?</s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Street vacation|Street vacation]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Street vacation|Street vacation]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Lord Sidious 82|Lord Sidious 82]] ([[User talk:Lord Sidious 82|talk]]) and [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]) at 10:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Lord Sidious 82|Lord Sidious 82]] ([[User talk:Lord Sidious 82|talk]]) and [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Cloudz679|Cloudz679]] ([[User talk:Cloudz679|talk]]) at 10:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Antonín Cyril Stojan|Lord Sidious 82|subpage=Antonín Cyril Stojan}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Antonín Cyril Stojan|Cloudz679}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* {{ping|Cloudz679}}: New enough, long enough, no copyvio problems. The hook, while cited, is going to put me to sleep, and I think it would put readers who aren't aware of the Catholic meaning of Venerable to sleep as well. Unfortunately, the article doesn't have anything better to offer in terms of a hook. QPQ pending. At this point, it's about the hook and QPQ to get this approved. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 05:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:* {{ping|Cloudz679}}: New enough, long enough, no copyvio problems. The hook, while cited, is going to put me to sleep, and I think it would put readers who aren't aware of the Catholic meaning of Venerable to sleep as well. Unfortunately, the article doesn't have anything better to offer in terms of a hook. QPQ pending. At this point, it's about the hook and QPQ to get this approved. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 05:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Line 34: Line 25:
 
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but added a "citation needed" tag for the dates mentioned at the end of the first paragraph under Beatification process. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but added a "citation needed" tag for the dates mentioned at the end of the first paragraph under Beatification process. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 
*{{reply to|Yoninah}} I was unaware of this DYK 'requirement' and cannot find mention of it in the rules. However I have attempted to improve the referencing by citing the ones I could find support for, and removing the others. <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Cloudz679|C]][[:User talk:Cloudz679|<span style="color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD;">679</span>]]</font> 23:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 
*{{reply to|Yoninah}} I was unaware of this DYK 'requirement' and cannot find mention of it in the rules. However I have attempted to improve the referencing by citing the ones I could find support for, and removing the others. <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Cloudz679|C]][[:User talk:Cloudz679|<span style="color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD;">679</span>]]</font> 23:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] When a fact in an article stands out, it should be cited, regardless of DYK. Thank you for adding that cite and tidying up. Restoring tick per Raymie's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] When a fact in an article stands out, it should be cited, regardless of DYK. Thank you for adding that cite and tidying up. Restoring tick per Raymie's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 23:32, 26 February 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Antonín Cyril Stojan

Created by Lord Sidious 82 (talk) and Cloudz679 (talk). Nominated by Cloudz679 (talk) at 10:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Template:Ping: New enough, long enough, no copyvio problems. The hook, while cited, is going to put me to sleep, and I think it would put readers who aren't aware of the Catholic meaning of Venerable to sleep as well. Unfortunately, the article doesn't have anything better to offer in terms of a hook. QPQ pending. At this point, it's about the hook and QPQ to get this approved. Raymie (tc) 05:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Adding icon to reflect nomination status. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Reply to Have now completed QPQ. I appreciate that, as the reviewer, you may not be interested in the Catholic church, but I imagine many readers might be. I tried to make the hook "short and punchy" per WP:DYKHOOK. C679 19:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  • A couple of possible alternates with a bit more detail and interest (ALT2 may have more than necessary):
  • Symbol question.svg MopTop, you should never add an approval tick unless you have actually reviewed the nomination, in which case you should be explaining what it was you reviewed; however, it's generally considered polite to allow the original reviewer to take that step once he or she is satisfied. In this case, Raymie is courteously waiting for Cloudz679 to say whether, as nominator, the ALT1 hook is okay, and if it is the tick will be added, but as reviewer Raymie should be the one to apply the tick. Thank you for your understanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Sorry, I misunderstood, but I meant well. The user had forgotten to include an icon before and I assumed they had forgotten again. --MopTop (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  • MopTop, that's very understandable, and I'm glad you want to help. It's just that the one thing we can't ever assume is the tick. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. Raymie (tc) 17:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but added a "citation needed" tag for the dates mentioned at the end of the first paragraph under Beatification process. Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Reply to I was unaware of this DYK 'requirement' and cannot find mention of it in the rules. However I have attempted to improve the referencing by citing the ones I could find support for, and removing the others. C679 23:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg When a fact in an article stands out, it should be cited, regardless of DYK. Thank you for adding that cite and tidying up. Restoring tick per Raymie's review. Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)