Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Apacheta-Aguilucho volcanic complex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boud (good to go!) |
imported>Jo-Jo Eumerus (Imma play this safe) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New (at the time of nomination), long enough, within policy, hook is good and inline referenced. The hook is based on an open-access academic reference, from a journal called [[Energies (journal)]] published by [[MDPI]]. MDPI is somewhat controversial (see the lead of [[MDPI]]), but I don't think this invalidates this DYK. The claim could be NPOVed later on if sourced counterclaims appeared, and the claim is not especially difficult to verify in the long term if Enel Green Power carries out its plan to start a geothermal power plant in that volcanic complex. Good to go! [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 00:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New (at the time of nomination), long enough, within policy, hook is good and inline referenced. The hook is based on an open-access academic reference, from a journal called [[Energies (journal)]] published by [[MDPI]]. MDPI is somewhat controversial (see the lead of [[MDPI]]), but I don't think this invalidates this DYK. The claim could be NPOVed later on if sourced counterclaims appeared, and the claim is not especially difficult to verify in the long term if Enel Green Power carries out its plan to start a geothermal power plant in that volcanic complex. Good to go! [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 00:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :*: Hum. {{replyto|Boud}}, assuming that you've access to it would [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115006486 this] be a better source for a hook? It does say that it's the only project moving forward out of several.[[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 12:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:47, 24 September 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Apacheta-Aguilucho volcanic complex
- ... that the first geothermal energy project in Chile has been planned at the Apacheta-Aguilucho volcanic complex?
- Reviewed: Matt Poskay
Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 19:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC).
New (at the time of nomination), long enough, within policy, hook is good and inline referenced. The hook is based on an open-access academic reference, from a journal called Energies (journal) published by MDPI. MDPI is somewhat controversial (see the lead of MDPI), but I don't think this invalidates this DYK. The claim could be NPOVed later on if sourced counterclaims appeared, and the claim is not especially difficult to verify in the long term if Enel Green Power carries out its plan to start a geothermal power plant in that volcanic complex. Good to go! Boud (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hum. Template:Replyto, assuming that you've access to it would this be a better source for a hook? It does say that it's the only project moving forward out of several.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)