Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Arab television drama"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (needs a reviewer) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (OK) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough. The hook fact is appropriately cited inline and the article seems sufficiently referenced to me. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 10:02, 2 January 2013
Arab television drama
- ... that Arab soap operas are a type of serialized fiction on television in the Arab world that are similar in style to Latin American telenovelas?
Created/expanded by Underlying lk (talk). Nominated by Northamerica1000 (talk) at 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Not all paragraphs are sourced. DYK 2 One inline citation per paragraph— Maile (talk) 20:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- To be specific, the first two paragraphs of the "Jordan" section need inline citations. Although the article has been edited since the above comment, these two paragraphs still need citations. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- I've notified the article's creator about this nomination, to see if they're interested in adding further sources to qualify this article for DYK. See: User talk:Underlying lk#Arab television drama. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- I added a couple of sources to the 'Jordan' section.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Great! Thank you. Now this is ready for a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. The hook fact is appropriately cited inline and the article seems sufficiently referenced to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)