Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Archie Amerson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Usernameunique (Reviewed) |
imported>Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 (re) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] GA, in time, long enough, sourced, inline/offline hook citation accepted AGF, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. {{u|BU Rob13}}, any particular reason to have the attribution to the ''Spectator'' in the hook? Seems a bit punchier without it. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 06:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] GA, in time, long enough, sourced, inline/offline hook citation accepted AGF, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. {{u|BU Rob13}}, any particular reason to have the attribution to the ''Spectator'' in the hook? Seems a bit punchier without it. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 06:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :**{{re|Usernameunique}} I'm fine taking it out. I usually try to attribute such "catchy" quotes to a particular paper to make it clear it isn't Wikipedia asserting the quote. ~ [[User:BU Rob13|<b>Rob</b><small><sub>13</sub></small>]]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">[[User talk:BU Rob13|Talk]]</sup> 07:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 07:24, 7 January 2018
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Archie Amerson
- ... that Canadian football player Archie Amerson was described by The Hamilton Spectator as both halves of the Hamilton Tiger-Cats' "one-two punch"? Source: "Past woes shouldn't be extra motivation"
Improved to Good Article status by BU Rob13 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC).
GA, in time, long enough, sourced, inline/offline hook citation accepted AGF, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done. Template:U, any particular reason to have the attribution to the Spectator in the hook? Seems a bit punchier without it. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Re I'm fine taking it out. I usually try to attribute such "catchy" quotes to a particular paper to make it clear it isn't Wikipedia asserting the quote. ~ Rob13Talk 07:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)