Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Archive of Our Own"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>KolbertBot m (Bot: HTTP→HTTPS (v477)) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|Bobamnertiopsis]] ([[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|Bobamnertiopsis]] ([[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Bobamnertiopsis}} Date and length fine, however I do have a question about the hook. What is it that makes the source reliable? Because to me it looks like a blog post. Can you shed some light on this for me please before I can proceed with the review? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|< | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Bobamnertiopsis}} Date and length fine, however I do have a question about the hook. What is it that makes the source reliable? Because to me it looks like a blog post. Can you shed some light on this for me please before I can proceed with the review? <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the Queen!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 09:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
| − | ::* {{ping|The C of E}} Hey, C of E, thanks for asking. ''[[io9]]'' is a blog (per its own article on our site and per its [https://gizmodo.com/about-gizmodo-5732042 own admission]), but it has behind it the editorial staff of [[Gizmodo]], its parent site, and the post was written by a staff writer. ''io9'' has more credibility than would a self-published blog and it's cited on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Io9&limit=1000&from=0 ~1,000 pages] on this site. Hope this helps! Best, [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|< | + | ::* {{ping|The C of E}} Hey, C of E, thanks for asking. ''[[io9]]'' is a blog (per its own article on our site and per its [https://gizmodo.com/about-gizmodo-5732042 own admission]), but it has behind it the editorial staff of [[Gizmodo]], its parent site, and the post was written by a staff writer. ''io9'' has more credibility than would a self-published blog and it's cited on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Io9&limit=1000&from=0 ~1,000 pages] on this site. Hope this helps! Best, [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="color:660000; font-family:'Andalus';">'''Bob'''</span><span style="color:00FFCC;">Amnertiopsis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bobamnertiopsis|∴]]<sub>[[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="font-family:'Tunga'; color:#FF9999;">ChatMe!</span>]]</sub> 16:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
| − | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, I am happy with that explanation. Hook is fine then. QPQ done and no close paraphrasing. Good to go. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|< | + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, I am happy with that explanation. Hook is fine then. QPQ done and no close paraphrasing. Good to go. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:The C of E|<span style="color:red;">The C of E </span><span style="color:blue;"> God Save the Queen!</span>]]''' ([[User talk:The C of E|<span style="color:darkblue;">talk</span>]])</span> 10:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC) |
* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I have returned this from p6 because the hook is sourced to some guy on tumblr, not to io9. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC) | * [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I have returned this from p6 because the hook is sourced to some guy on tumblr, not to io9. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 12:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | :* I can't necessarily argue with that. Here are two alts. [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|< | + | :* I can't necessarily argue with that. Here are two alts. [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="color:660000; font-family:'Andalus';">'''Bob'''</span><span style="color:00FFCC;">Amnertiopsis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bobamnertiopsis|∴]]<sub>[[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="font-family:'Tunga'; color:#FF9999;">ChatMe!</span>]]</sub> 16:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC) |
::*'''ALT1:''' ... that '''[[Archive of Our Own]]''' hosts over two million [[fan fiction|stories]] and artpieces by [[fandom|fans of media franchises]]? (see ref 1) | ::*'''ALT1:''' ... that '''[[Archive of Our Own]]''' hosts over two million [[fan fiction|stories]] and artpieces by [[fandom|fans of media franchises]]? (see ref 1) | ||
::*'''ALT2:''' ... that the [[Marvel Cinematic Universe|Marvel universe]], ''[[Supernatural (U.S. TV series)|Supernatural]]'', ''[[Sherlock (TV series)|Sherlock]]'', and ''[[Harry Potter]]'' are among the most popular [[fandom]]s on '''[[Archive of Our Own]]'''? (ref 3) | ::*'''ALT2:''' ... that the [[Marvel Cinematic Universe|Marvel universe]], ''[[Supernatural (U.S. TV series)|Supernatural]]'', ''[[Sherlock (TV series)|Sherlock]]'', and ''[[Harry Potter]]'' are among the most popular [[fandom]]s on '''[[Archive of Our Own]]'''? (ref 3) | ||
| − | [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New review needed. [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|< | + | [[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New review needed. [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="color:660000; font-family:'Andalus';">'''Bob'''</span><span style="color:00FFCC;">Amnertiopsis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bobamnertiopsis|∴]]<sub>[[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="font-family:'Tunga'; color:#FF9999;">ChatMe!</span>]]</sub> 05:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC) |
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] ALT1 and ALT2 are 97 and 125 characters, short enough. They are both in the article. They are both cited. I can confirm ALT1 in the reference which is reliable. Reference 3 does not mention supernatural or Sherlock in this regard, so either pick another reference for that or modify the article, or give up on that ALT2 hook. So only ALT1 is good. Considering previous review and that article is fully cited and is not biased, it is good to go with ALT1. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 22:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] ALT1 and ALT2 are 97 and 125 characters, short enough. They are both in the article. They are both cited. I can confirm ALT1 in the reference which is reliable. Reference 3 does not mention supernatural or Sherlock in this regard, so either pick another reference for that or modify the article, or give up on that ALT2 hook. So only ALT1 is good. Considering previous review and that article is fully cited and is not biased, it is good to go with ALT1. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 22:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::* Thanks, {{u|Graeme Bartlett}}! On ALT2, the info is mentioned not in the article text but in the infographic part of the way down [http://www.dailydot.com/fandom/ao3-million-fanfic/ the page]. Best, [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|< | + | ::* Thanks, {{u|Graeme Bartlett}}! On ALT2, the info is mentioned not in the article text but in the infographic part of the way down [http://www.dailydot.com/fandom/ao3-million-fanfic/ the page]. Best, [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="color:660000; font-family:'Andalus';">'''Bob'''</span><span style="color:00FFCC;">Amnertiopsis</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Bobamnertiopsis|∴]]<sub>[[User talk:Bobamnertiopsis|<span style="font-family:'Tunga'; color:#FF9999;">ChatMe!</span>]]</sub> 02:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC) |
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK hook ALT2 is confirmed by the image. So either ALT1 or 2 are good to go. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 02:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK hook ALT2 is confirmed by the image. So either ALT1 or 2 are good to go. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 02:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:05, 25 January 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Archive of Our Own
... that as of June 2015, the most popular story on the fanfiction site Archive of Our Own was "I Am Groot", described as a "masterpiece of hardcore Guardians of the Galaxy erotica"?Source: What is the most popular work fanfic on Archive of Our Own? Tumblr user Touka-Tokyo used the site's "kudos" system — basically a "like" — it's the masterpiece of hardcore Guardians of the Galaxy erotica story "I Am Groot" by sherlocksmyth."
- Reviewed: Hot link (sausage)
Created by Bobamnertiopsis (talk). Self-nominated at 15:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC).
Template:Ping Date and length fine, however I do have a question about the hook. What is it that makes the source reliable? Because to me it looks like a blog post. Can you shed some light on this for me please before I can proceed with the review? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Hey, C of E, thanks for asking. io9 is a blog (per its own article on our site and per its own admission), but it has behind it the editorial staff of Gizmodo, its parent site, and the post was written by a staff writer. io9 has more credibility than would a self-published blog and it's cited on ~1,000 pages on this site. Hope this helps! Best, BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 16:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
OK, I am happy with that explanation. Hook is fine then. QPQ done and no close paraphrasing. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
I have returned this from p6 because the hook is sourced to some guy on tumblr, not to io9. Gatoclass (talk) 12:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't necessarily argue with that. Here are two alts. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 16:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Archive of Our Own hosts over two million stories and artpieces by fans of media franchises? (see ref 1)
- ALT2: ... that the Marvel universe, Supernatural, Sherlock, and Harry Potter are among the most popular fandoms on Archive of Our Own? (ref 3)
New review needed. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 05:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
ALT1 and ALT2 are 97 and 125 characters, short enough. They are both in the article. They are both cited. I can confirm ALT1 in the reference which is reliable. Reference 3 does not mention supernatural or Sherlock in this regard, so either pick another reference for that or modify the article, or give up on that ALT2 hook. So only ALT1 is good. Considering previous review and that article is fully cited and is not biased, it is good to go with ALT1. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Template:U! On ALT2, the info is mentioned not in the article text but in the infographic part of the way down the page. Best, BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 02:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
OK hook ALT2 is confirmed by the image. So either ALT1 or 2 are good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)