Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Argus Retinal Prosthesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michaelmas1957 (comment) |
imported>BlueMoonset (reviewer for medicial device article needed) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::Mmmmm. I can see the issues now. Sources aren't too specialised as well. Articles do relate that product can only help with a specific condition, and only then improve slightly. [[User:Gareth E Kegg|Gareth E Kegg]] ([[User talk:Gareth E Kegg|talk]]) 22:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | ::Mmmmm. I can see the issues now. Sources aren't too specialised as well. Articles do relate that product can only help with a specific condition, and only then improve slightly. [[User:Gareth E Kegg|Gareth E Kegg]] ([[User talk:Gareth E Kegg|talk]]) 22:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::Suggest some improvements and I'll get to work on them. – [[User:Michaelmas1957|Michaelmas'''1957''']] ([[User talk:Michaelmas1957|talk]]) 10:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC) | :::Suggest some improvements and I'll get to work on them. – [[User:Michaelmas1957|Michaelmas'''1957''']] ([[User talk:Michaelmas1957|talk]]) 10:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] Need a reviewer willing to work with nominator on what's needed for DYK on a medical article. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 06:24, 13 March 2013
Argus Retinal Prosthesis
- ... that the Argus Retinal Prosthesis is the first functioning artificial eye to be approved for commercial use in the United States?
- Reviewed: Jassem Alwan
Created by Michaelmas1957 (talk). Self nominated at 09:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC).
Length and date good, and hook well cited. 'Bionic eye' is a redirect to Visual prosthesis, though. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Is this hook better? – Michaelmas1957 (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- As an outside comment of a possible issue, you may want to read WP:MEDRS. There was a fluff-up with a hook about an exoskeleton a few months back, and this may have similar issues as it is on the fence between a medical article and about a product. Chris857 (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Mmmmm. I can see the issues now. Sources aren't too specialised as well. Articles do relate that product can only help with a specific condition, and only then improve slightly. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Suggest some improvements and I'll get to work on them. – Michaelmas1957 (talk) 10:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Mmmmm. I can see the issues now. Sources aren't too specialised as well. Articles do relate that product can only help with a specific condition, and only then improve slightly. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Need a reviewer willing to work with nominator on what's needed for DYK on a medical article. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)